Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 4;2021(6):CD007535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007535.pub4

Summary of findings 2. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) plus clomiphene versus clomiphene for subfertile women with PCOS.

CHM plus clomiphene compared to clomiphene for subfertile women with PCOS
Population: subfertile women with PCOS
Setting: fertility clinics
Intervention: Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) + clomiphene
Comparison: clomiphene
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) Number of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Clomiphene CHM + clomiphene
Live birth Not reported
Pregnancy rate (per woman) 315 per 1000 584 per 1000
(485 to 677) OR 3.06
(2.05 to 4.55) 470
(6 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa,b  
Adverse events Not reported
*The basis for the assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded one level for serious risk of bias: study methods not described in sufficient detail.
bDowngraded one level for serious imprecision: small studies, low overall event rate.