Skip to main content
. 2021 May 21;12:651759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651759

Table 2.

Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting correctness of facial expression recognition as measured with the FEMT in Study 1 and Study 2.

Study 1 Study 2
ΔR2 B SE β ΔR2 B SE β
Step 1 0.02 0.04*
Gender −0.03 0.03 −0.15 −0.06 0.02 −0.21*
Step 2 0.01 0.01
Gender −0.03 0.03 −0.14 −0.05 0.03 −0.19*
Empathy 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.03 0.04
Step 3 0.08* 0.02
Gender −0.04 0.03 −0.16 −0.05 0.03 −0.19*
Empathy 0.01 0.04 −0.01 0.02 0.03 0.06
Age −0.05 0.02 −0.29* 0.01 0.01 0.14
Step 4 0.11** 0.03*
Gender −0.20 0.03 −0.09 −0.02 0.03 −0.07
Empathy −0.01 0.03 −0.04 0.02 0.03 0.07
Age −0.05 0.02 −0.29* 0.01 0.01 0.12
VVGE −0.03 0.01 −0.34** −0.03 0.01 −0.21*
Total adj. R2 0.22** 0.10**
N 67 151

p < 0.10

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01.

Gender: 1 = females, 2 = males; Empathy = trait empathy; VVGE, violent video game exposure (in hours per day).