Table 1.
Echocardiography | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Advantages | Limitations | Advantages | Limitations | |
Portability | Highly portable | Not portable—fixed systems | ||
Ionisation | Non-ionising | Non-ionising | ||
Image quality | Highly variable—from excellent to poor; dependent upon sonographer skills, intrinsic patient echo window factors and patient cooperation | More consistently excellent image quality | Image quality degraded by arrhythmia, poor breath-holding and motion | |
Speed of scanning | Rapid, tailored approach | Longer protocols relative to echo | ||
Myocardial characterisation | Strain assessment allows good contractile function assessment | Range of tissue characterisation parameters that yield data regarding oedema, inflammation, extracellular volume and scarring (fibrosis/infarct) | Quantitative myocardial strain analysis not yet in clinical practise | |
Volumetric assessment | Variable depending on image quality for left ventricle | Limited for right ventricle | Excellent left and right ventricular volumetric assessment | |
Diastolic left ventricular assessment | Superior by echo | Not yet validated for clinical CMR use | ||
Valve assessment | Superior characterisation of blood flow velocity and gradients | Superior assessment of valvular regurgitation volumes | ||
Pulmonary pressure assessments | Quantitative approaches to pulmonary pressure estimates (PASP and PADP) in addition to visual assessment of septal motion and pulmonary artery diameter | Requires measurable TR jet | Qualitative assessment of septal motion and pulmonary artery calibre only | No quantitative measures |
Temporal resolution | Superior temporal resolution | Inferior temporal resolution | ||
Staff factors | Highly trained sonographers required | Highly trained radiographers required | ||
Availability | Widely available | Availability limited to fixed locations in certain hospitals/medical facilities | ||
Patient factors | Claustrophobia is not a concern | Unattractive to claustrophobic patients | ||
Can scan patients with orthopnoea | Patient must be able to lie flat for ≥40 min | |||
Patient can be scanned in echo lab or a portable machine taken to the bedside | Difficult logistics transporting critically unwell patients to the scanner | |||
Generally scanned in a semi-recumbent position; can also obtain at least some data if lying flat | Patients must be able to comfortably hold their breath while lying flat | |||
Kidney function not an issue with echo with or without echo contrast agents | Caution in patients with poor renal function if using gadolinium-based contrast, although lesser concerns with modern agents | |||
Magnetic materials | No concern | Patients or equipment with ferromagnetic materials cannot enter the scanner room | ||
Cost | Relatively cheap equipment | Much more expensive than echo systems | ||
Infection control considerations | Close proximity of sonographer and patient | Distance between patient and radiographer |
CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure; PADP, Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure; TR, tricuspid regurgitant.