Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 20;2(2):tgab021. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab021

Table 1.

Overview of participant characteristics

Table 1-1. Demographic data
Gender Age (years) Handedness Education (years) SUD 1 Times EMDR Interval (days) SUD 2
Patients F: 7, M: 2 32.8 (7.0) 69.8 (64.0) 13.9 (2.3) 7.9 (2.1) 8.7 (2.9) 339.3 (111.4) 2.8 (2.8)
Controls F: 7, M: 2 31.4 (7.4) 100 (0) 18.3 (0.9)
Table 1-2. Diagnostic indices
CAPS IES-R DES-II
Ree Avo and Num Hyp Total Int Avo Hyp Total
Pt1 24.4 (7.9) 33.4 (10.3) 22.9 (8.1) 80.8 (20.1) 22.8 (6.0) 16.7 (5.5) 16.7 (4.9) 56.1 (13.5) 950.0 (575.6)
Pt2 9.2 (5.1) 21.3 (15.4) 16.7 (8.3) 47.2 (25.9) 9.8 (5.3) 15.0 (8.0) 11.0 (5.4) 35.8 (15.9) 533.3 (437.6)
Table 1-3. RSDI scores
ID Ree Avo Dis Total
Pt1 16.4 (8.1) 8.6 (5.9) 5.9 (6.3) 30.9 (9.9)
Pt2 11.3 (5.9) 4.2 (5.5) 2.2 (2.7) 17.7 (12.3)
Ct 5.4 (4.7) 1.2 (2.0) 0.8 (1.7) 7.4 (7.7)

Note: Frequency counts are shown for gender, whereas means (SDs) are shown for all other items. Age, age at the time of the first scan; handedness, Edinburgh Handedness Inventory score (Oldfield 1971); SUD 1, SUD score at the time of the first scan; Times EMDR, session number for EMDR (combined) in phases 4–7 conducted between the first and the second scans; Interval, number of days between the first and second scans; SUD 2, SUD score at the time of the second scan; F, female; M, male; Pt1, patients at the first scan; Pt2, patients at the second scan; Ct, controls; Ree, reexperiencing; Avo, avoidance; Num, numbing; Hyp, hyperarousal; Int, intrusions; Dis, dissociation. Additional information can be found in Supplementary Tables S2S4.