Skip to main content
. 2021 May 28;7:e572. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.572

Table 1. Plant recognition studies based on traditional methods.

Researchers Feature extraction methods Classification methods Datasets Accuracy score (%)
Wu et al. (2007) Shape features Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) Flavia 90.00
Silva, Marcal & Silva (2013) Shape features Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) ICL 87.00
Naresh & Nagendraswamy (2016) Improved Local Binary Pattern (LBP) k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) Flavia 97.55
Swedish 96.83
Foliage 90.62
Tsolakidis, Kosmopoulos & Papadourakis (2014) Zernike Moment & histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) Support Vector Machine (SVM) Flavia 97.18
Swedish 98.13
Kadir et al. (2012) Shape, color, texture features & PCA PNN Flavia 95.00
Foliage 93.75
Elhariri, El-Bendary & Hassanien (2014)) Shape, color & texture features LDA ICL 92.65
Wang, Liang & Guo (2014) Dual-scale decomposition & local binary descriptors k-NN Flavia 99.25
ICL 98.03
Saleem et al. (2019) Shape & texture features k-NN Flavia 98.75
Munisami et al. (2015) Shape & color features k-NN Folio 87.30
Ren, Wang & Zhao (2012) Multi-scale overlapped block LBP SVM Swedish 96.67
Sulc & Matas (2015) Rotation & scale invariant descriptor based on LBP SVM Flavia 99.50
Foliage 99.00
Swedish 99.80
Folio 99.20
Qi et al. (2014) Pairwise Rotation Invariant Co-occurrence Local Binary Pattern SVM Swedish 99.38
Flower102 84.20
Hewitt & Mahmoud (2018) Shape features & signal features extracted from local area integral invariants (LAIIs) SVM Flavia 96.60
Foliage 93.10
Folio 91.40
Swedish 97.80
LeafSnap 64.90
Zhu et al. (2015) Shape & color features SVM Flower17 91.90
Flower102 73.10