. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 4.

Published in final edited form as: Matern Child Health J. 2015 Dec;19(12):2646–2653. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1785-z

Table 2.

Association between childhood residential mobility and non-medical use of prescription drugs, NSDUH 2010, (n=15,745).

		Model 2^b	Model 2^c	Model 3^d	Model 4^e
	OR (95% CI)	aOR (95% CI)	aOR (95% CI)	aOR (95% CI)	aOR (95% CI)
Moves in Previous Five Years
1 – 2 versus 0	1.26 (1.20, 1.41)	1.32 (1.17, 1.50)	1.18 (1.04, 1.35)	1.16 (1.01, 1.34)	1.16 (1.01, 1.33)
≥ 3 versus 0	1.81 (1.49, 2.21)	1.94 (1.57, 2.39)	1.35 (1.09, 1.68)	1.27 (1.02, 1.60)	1.25 (1.00, 1.56)

NSDUH: National Study on Drug Use and Health; n: Number of participants; OR: unadjusted odds ratio; aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

Respondents were classified based on 0 moves (non-mobile), 1–2 moves (low mobility), and ≥3 moves (residential instability).

Model 1 adjusts for race, sex, age, and financial assistance.

Model 2 adjusts for Model 1 covariates + perceived overall health, bonding to school, sensation seeking behavior, average grades, delinquent behavior, and other drug use.

Model 3 adjusts for Model 2 covariates + parental monitoring, parental disproval of drug use, peer drug use, and peer disapproval of drug use.

Model 4 adjusts for Model 3 covariates + availability of drugs and school norms against drug use.