Table 2.

Summary of mapping reads

Sample id	Total pairs	Mapped reads (%)	Concordant pairs (%)	Sample id	Total pairs	Mapped reads (%)	Concordant pairs
CP_t1	14,937,456	70.6	65.8	CA_t1	16,219,542	76.1%	71.8%
CP_t2	17,645,457	69.3	64.2	CA_t2	30,189,007	76.3%	72.5%
CP_t3	30,034,015	71	66.2	CA_t3	34,807,619	72.7%	68.7%
CP_leaf	24,157,305	62.5	56.4	CA_leaf	22,513,062	72.3%	67.9%
WP_t1	19,665,537	60.9	52.6	WA_t1	17,375,339	63.1%	55.7%
WP_t2	29,976,758	61.1	52.9	WA_t2	29,481,030	64.0%	57.4%
WP_t3	30,370,082	62.3	53.2	WA_t3	30,772,914	65.0%	58.4%
WP_leaf	23,136,777	57.8	50.5	WA_leaf	25,821,118	61.0%	54.2%