Table 1.
Device | N | Biofilm removal rate (%) | Surface roughness (µm) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glass | Sofreliner | Toughsilon | Sofreliner | Toughsilon | ||
AIRFLOW | 3 | 32.5 ± 9.9 | 51.8 ± 8.5 | 48.5 ± 8.3 | 66.2 ± 7.3 | 90.2 ± 23.5* |
MSM-UNIT | 3 | 60.0 ± 12.8* | 68.3 ± 6.6 | 71.2 ± 3.4* | 57.0 ± 8.1 | 66.2 ± 8.1 |
Values are mean ± SD. The biofilm removal rate of the MSM-UNIT was significantly different to that of AIRFLOW (*p < 0.05). The surface roughness of AIRFLOW for Toughsilon was significantly larger than that of the MSM-UNIT (*p < 0.05). The surface roughness of the AIRFLOW treated area for Toughsilon was significantly larger than that of the control