Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 4;21:286. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01647-4

Table 1.

Biofilm removal rate and surface roughness using AIRFLOW and MSM-UNIT

Device N Biofilm removal rate (%) Surface roughness (µm)
Glass Sofreliner Toughsilon Sofreliner Toughsilon
AIRFLOW 3 32.5 ± 9.9 51.8 ± 8.5 48.5 ± 8.3 66.2 ± 7.3 90.2 ± 23.5*
MSM-UNIT 3 60.0 ± 12.8* 68.3 ± 6.6 71.2 ± 3.4* 57.0 ± 8.1 66.2 ± 8.1

Values are mean ± SD. The biofilm removal rate of the MSM-UNIT was significantly different to that of AIRFLOW (*p < 0.05). The surface roughness of AIRFLOW for Toughsilon was significantly larger than that of the MSM-UNIT (*p < 0.05). The surface roughness of the AIRFLOW treated area for Toughsilon was significantly larger than that of the control