Skip to main content
. 2021 May 5;41(18):4100–4119. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1152-20.2021

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Evaluation of predicted fMRI sentences. Predictions were evaluated using two metrics. Left, The rank metric provided a measure of how accurately the predicted fMRI representation reflected the original sentence recording, comparative to recordings of all of the other 239 mismatched sentences. Right, The semipartial rank metric controlled for the predictions made by other models in evaluation. Specifically, before evaluating the prediction made by one model (InferSent above), the predictions made by other model(s) are regressed out from InferSent's prediction (in the above illustration BoW(GloVe) is regressed out). The residual is then compared with the original fMRI activation, and ranked relative to the other sentences. Both rank and semipartial rank metrics were normalized to the range 0-1. For instance, if the score was 229, the normalized score was 0.95, computed as (229 – 1)/239.