Table 3. Participants’ perceptions of the virtual reality trainer.
| SD | D | Neither | A | SA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VR anatomy was realistic | 2 (4.9) | 3 (7.3) | 3 (7.3) | 27 (65.9) | 6 (14.6) |
| Ability to see internal structures | 0 (0.0) | 3 (7.3) | 13 (31.7) | 12 (29.3) | 12 (31.7) |
| Real-time feedback was helpful | 3 (7.3) | 3 (7.3) | 5 (12.2) | 17 (41.5) | 13 (31.7) |
| VR trainer was easy to use | 3 (7.3) | 4 (9.8) | 9 (22.0) | 23 (56.1) | 2 (4.9) |
| VR trainer was enjoyable | 2 (4.9) | 1 (2.4) | 5 (12.2) | 13 31.7) | 20 (48.8) |
| VR trainer improved my confidence | 4 (9.8) | 6 (14.6) | 11 (26.8) | 11 (26.8) | 9 (22.0) |
| VR trainer promoted learning | 2 (4.9) | 3 (7.3) | 2 (4.9) | 13 (31.7) | 21 (51.2) |
| VR useful for skills training | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) | 3 (7.3) | 12 (29.3) | 25 (61.0) |
| Incorporate VR into medical training | 0 (0.0) | 2 (4.9) | 3 (7.3) | 16 (39.0) | 20 (48.8) |
SD: Strongly disagree; D: Disagree; Neither: Neither disagree nor agree; A: Agree; SA: Strongly agree; Data are n (%)