TABLE 3.
Predictor | β | SEβ | OR | Wald χ2 | p |
Age | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.02 | 0.84 | 0.34 |
Gender | 0.71 | 0.49 | 2.03 | 2.06 | 0.15 |
Number of Children | –0.21 | 0.47 | 0.81 | 0.20 | 0.66 |
Parental separation | 0.20 | 0.52 | 1.23 | 0.15 | 0.70 |
Own physical disease | –0.45 | 0.51 | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.37 |
Psychological treatment in the past | –1.24 | 0.44 | 0.29 | 8.09 | 0.004 |
Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) | –0.01 | 0.02 | 0.99 | 0.54 | 0.46 |
State of health (EQ VAS) | 0.001 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.002 | 0.96 |
Depression (PHQ-9) | –0.12 | 0.07 | 0.89 | 3.03 | 0.08 |
Anxiety (GAD-7) | 0.20 | 0.08 | 1.22 | 5.88 | 0.02 |
Distress (DT) | 0.01 | 0.11 | 1.01 | 0.01 | 0.95 |
Relationship satisfaction (QMI)a | 0.04 | 0.02 | 1.04 | 3.93 | 0.05 |
1n = 31 were excluded due to death of the patient as separation reason. Relationship dissolution was coded as 1 = yes (partnership with the cancer patient did not exist at the time of the survey) and 2 = no (partnership still exist).
DT, NCCN Distress Thermometer; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire; GAD-7, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Seven Item Scale; EQ-5D, EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire; EQ VAS, EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale; and OR, odds ratio. Significant coefficients in bold.
aRelationship satisfaction with the cancer patient.