Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;10:e63359. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63359

Figure 4. Decreasing the laser repetition rate to <1 MHz allows holographic stimulation of stCoChR-expressing cells with <1 mW average power per cell: principal neurons.

(A) The laser repetition rate is decreased using pulse picking (top panel). With this approach, the average power delivered to the sample linearly increases with the repetition rate (bottom panel). (B) Representative traces from the same electrophysiologically recorded L2/3 pyramidal neuron stimulated at different repetition rates (from top to bottom panel: 1 MHz, 500 kHz, 100 kHz; energy per pulse: 5 nJ). (C) Probability of discharging one or more AP as a function of the laser repetition rate for principal neurons expressing stCoChR in vivo (illumination duration: 100 ms). n = 6 cells from two mice. (D) AP probability obtained at 50 kHz and 1 MHz repetition rates, but delivering lower average power (0.25 mW vs 1 mW) and higher energy per pulse (5 nJ vs 1 nJ) at 50 kHz compared to 1 MHz. n = 6 cells from two mice; Wilcoxon signed rank test p=0.88.

Figure 4—source data 1. Source data for Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Decreasing the laser repetition rate to <1 MHz allows holographic stimulation of stCoChR-expressing cells with <1 mW average power per cell: SST-positive interneurons.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Related to Figure 4. (A) The laser repetition rate is decreased using pulse picking (top panel). With this approach, the average power delivered to the sample linearly increases with the repetition rate (bottom panel). (B) Representative traces from the same electrophysiologically recorded SST-positive interneuron stimulated at different repetition rates (from top to bottom panel: 1 MHz, 500 kHz, 100 kHz; energy/pulse: 5 nJ). (C) Probability of discharging one or more AP as a function of the laser repetition rate for SST-positive cells expressing stCoChR in vivo (energy per pulse: 5nJ); n = 6 cells from three mice. (D) AP probability obtained at 50 kHz and 1 MHz repetition rate, but delivering lower average power (0.25 mW vs 1 mW) and higher energy per pulse (5 nJ vs 1 nJ) at 50 kHz compared to 1 MHz. n = 6 cells from three mice; paired Student’s t-test, p=0.84.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for Figure 4—figure supplement 1.