Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 4;11:11837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91235-x

Table 2.

Concordance metrics between (A) the Mindray CL-900i anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG testing and the Roche Elecsys Anti SARS-CoV-2 testing, (B) the VidasIII anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG testing and the Roche Elecsys Anti SARS-CoV-2 testing, and (C) the BioMérieux VidasIII anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG testing and the Mindray CL-900i anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG testing.

Roche Elecsys anti SARS-CoV-2 Overall percent agreement Positive percent agreement Negative percent agreement Cohen’s kappa statistic
Positive Negative Total % (95 CI) % (95 CI) % (95 CI) k (95% CI)
(A) Mindray CL-900i anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG
Positive 155 14 169 93.4% (90.5–95.5%) 92.8% (87.9–95.8%) 93.8% (89.9–96.3%) 0.87 (0.83–0.90)
Negative 12 213 225
Total 167 227 394
(B) BioMérieux VidasIII anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG
Positive 155 5 160 95.7% (93.2–97.3%) 92.8% (87.9–95.8%) 97.8% (95.0–99.1%) 0.91 (0.88–0.94)
Negative 12 222 234
Total 167 227 394
Mindray CL-900i anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Overall percent agreement Positive percent agreement Negative percent agreement Cohen’s kappa statistic
Positive Negative Total % (95 CI) % (95 CI) % (95 CI) k (95% CI)
(C) BioMérieux VidasIII anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG
Positive 151 9 160 93.2% (90.2–95.3%) 89.3% (83.8–93.2%) 96.0% (92.6–97.9%) 0.86 (0.82–0.90)
Negative 18 216 234
Total 169 225 394

CI confidence interval.