Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 20;3(3):386–394.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.01.010

Table 3.

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Results in Propensity Score–Matched Cohorts of 112 Dialysis Patients and 112 Without Chronic Kidney Disease

Dialysis (n = 112) Non-CKD (n = 112) Pa
Interpretable scansb 111 (99%) 112 (100%) 0.99
With CABG 3 (3%) 8 (7%) 0.22
With coronary stent 7 (6%) 51 (46%) <0.001
Without any lesions 18 (16%) 19 (17%) 0.99
Per patienta
 No. of coronary segments 14.0 ± 1.2 14.4 ± 1.0 0.03
 Total no. of lesions 11.3 ± 8.6 10.5 ± 8.9 0.49
 No. of noncalcified lesions 0.5 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 3.6 <0.001
 No. of partially calcified lesions 5.8 ± 5.2 5.1 ± 5.5 0.18
 No. of calcified lesions 5.0 ± 5.7 3.1 ± 4.0 0.01

Note: Results are presented as mean ±standard deviation or number (percent).

Abbreviations and Definitions: CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; Non-CKD, non–chronic kidney disease at risk for cardiovascular disease.

a

Significance tested with χ2 tests for proportions and Mann-Whitney U tests for number of lesions.

b

In 1 patient, computed tomography angiography could not be interpreted reliably (see text).