Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar 27;36(7):1363–1370. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01818-4

Table 2.

Univariate logistic regression of demographic and CT-measured parameters of patients with MVP and severe MR with MAD, compared to those without MAD

Odds ratio [OR] 95% CI p value
Age 1.03 [0.95, 1.12] 0.44
Gender (Female) 11.75 [1.38, 99.7] 0.02*
Left ventricular ED volume 1.06 [0.96, 1.17] 0.27
Left ventricular ES volume 0.91 [0.71, 1.16] 0.45
Left atrial volume 0.99 [0.97, 1.02] 0.53
Left ventricular ejection fraction 0.86 [0.55, 1.34] 0.50
Distance between PM (mm) 0.83 [0.62, 1.09] 0.18
Angle between PMs 1.00 [0.93, 1.07] 0.98
ED MV annulus area 0.97 [0.95, 1] 0.045*
ED annulus dimension, AP 1.14 [0.79, 1.66] 0.47
ED annulus dimension, Lateral 1.48 [0.95, 2.31] 0.08
ES MV area 1.02 [0.99, 1.04] 0.14
ES annulus dimension, AP 0.90 [0.68, 1.19] 0.46
ES annulus dimension, Lateral 1.10 [0.8, 1.52] 0.57
Posterior leaflet length 1.39 [1.03, 1.88] 0.03*
Anterior leaflet length 0.89 [0.71, 1.12] 0.32
Atrial arrhythmias 1.45 [0.09, 23.9] 0.79
Premature ventricular contractions 9.63 [0.52, 177] 0.13
Inferior T-wave inversions 0.39 [0.05, 2.87] 0.36
QTc 1.01 [0.98, 1.05] 0.48

ED end-diastolic, ES end-systolic, PM papillary muscle, MV mitral valve, AP anterior–posterior, mL milliliter, mm millimeters, msec milliseconds, QTc corrected QT-interval