Table 1.
Distribution of Peruvian households according to their socioeconomic characteristics and city size, ENAHO 2008–2018
| Overall (excluding rural areas) | Natural region | City size (number of households) | Household size (members) | Household per capita expenditure, measured in Peruvian soles (S/) | Poverty level in the household | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Lima Metropolitan | Rest of the Coast | Highlands | Jungle | 401 to 10,000 | 10,001 to 100,000 | ≥ 101,001 | 1–3 | 4–6 | > 6 | Median (Q1-Q3) | Extreme poor | Non extreme poor | Non poor | |
| 2008 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 26,010 (100.0) | 3279 (31.4) | 6579 (22.9) | 10,724 (34.1) | 5428 (11.6) | 14,952 (42.8) | 6737 (20.1) | 4321 (37.0) | 8759 (33.4) | 9990 (39.0) | 7261 (27.6) | 4270.6 (2451.6–6915.8) | 2594 (8.8) | 5128 (22.4) | 13,780 (68.7) |
| 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 26,598 (100.0) | 3333 (32.2) | 6616 (22.3) | 11,116 (34.1) | 5533 (11.4) | 15,399 (42.4) | 6843 (19.8) | 4356 (37.8) | 8852 (33.0) | 10,278 (38.7) | 7468 (28.2) | 4443.1 (2574.9–7349.7) | 2396 (8.0) | 4926 (20.3) | 14,431 (71.7) |
| 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 27,176 (100.0) | 3353 (32.4) | 6684 (21.8) | 11,424 (34.4) | 5715 (11.4) | 15,814 (41.9) | 6961 (19.9) | 4401 (38.1) | 9000 (32.9) | 9997 (36.9) | 8179 (30.2) | 4815.3 (2851.0–7700.4) | 1804 (6.2) | 4583 (19.4) | 15,109 (74.3) |
| 2011 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 32,519 (100.0) | 3796 (31.2) | 8510 (22.0) | 13,510 (34.8) | 6852 (11.9) | 19,137 (43.4) | 8277 (19.5) | 5105 (37.1) | 10,767 (32.8) | 11,322 (35.4) | 10,430 (31.9) | 5182.8 (3121.7–8114.3) | 1751 (5.2) | 4841 (17.9) | 18,217 (76.9) |
| 2012 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 32,546 (100.0) | 3815 (31.5) | 8467 (21.3) | 13,425 (35.0) | 6839 (12.1) | 19,034 (43.3) | 8422 (19.7) | 5090 (37.0) | 11,235 (33.9) | 11,302 (34.4) | 10,009 (31.7) | 5559.0 (3393.2–8733.2) | 1580 (4.7) | 4588 (16.7) | 18,923 (78.7) |
| 2013 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 39,676 (100.0) | 5113 (31.4) | 10,263 (21.7) | 16,101 (34.7) | 8199 (12.2) | 22,986 (43.5) | 10,042 (19.7) | 6648 (36.8) | 14,009 (34.5) | 13,511 (34.9) | 12,156 (30.6) | 5851.9 (3615.1–9140.6) | 1571 (3.8) | 5230 (15.7) | 23,652 (80.4) |
| 2014 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 40,125 (100.0) | 5267 (31.4) | 10,204 (21.9) | 16,418 (34.9) | 8236 (11.8) | 22,900 (43.7) | 10,396 (19.2) | 6829 (37.1) | 14,636 (35.3) | 13,554 (35.1) | 11,935 (29.6) | 6078.9 (3799.4–9531.5) | 1378 (3.4) | 5056 (15.0) | 24,414 (81.6) |
| 2015 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 39,863 (100.0) | 5101 (32.4) | 10,692 (22.3) | 15,745 (33.9) | 8325 (11.4) | 23,016 (42.6) | 10,204 (18.8) | 6643 (38.6) | 15,763 (38.4) | 13,916 (35.0) | 10,184 (26.6) | 6333.3 (3971.9–9959.0) | 1329 (3.2) | 5153 (14.6) | 25,706 (82.2) |
| 2016 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 44,949 (100.0) | 5306 (31.9) | 13,579 (21.5) | 17,249 (34.7) | 8785 (11.9) | 25,608 (44.0) | 12,406 (18.7) | 6905 (37.3) | 17,716 (38.4) | 15,472 (35.8) | 11,731 (25.9) | 6685.8 (4256.3–10,547.0) | 1275 (2.9) | 5221 (13.8) | 29,289 (83.3) |
| 2017 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 43,545 (100.0) | 5434 (32.4) | 12,237 (21.0) | 17,047 (34.8) | 8827 (11.7) | 25,147 (43.5) | 11,317 (18.8) | 7081 (37.6) | 17,676 (39.1) | 14,479 (34.1) | 11,390 (26.8) | 6866.6 (4295.5–10,813.3) | 1212 (2.9) | 5246 (14.5) | 28,126 (82.6) |
| 2018 | |||||||||||||||
| n (%) | 47,700 (100.0) | 5458 (32.4) | 12,842 (21.1) | 19,791 (34.5) | 9609 (12.0) | 28,327 (43.9) | 12,013 (18.8) | 7360 (37.3) | 19,856 (40.0) | 15,106 (33.0) | 12,738 (30.0) | 7061.2 (4435.4–11,218.2) | 1069 (2.2) | 5680 (14.4) | 30,713 (83.4) |
% Proportions include the factor expansion and the complex survey design for each year of the ENAHO surveys
Q1-Q3: Quartile 1 - Quartile 3