Table 5.
Logistic regression showing the adjusted odds of modern contraceptive use among young Nigerian women
| Model 1 aOR (95% CI) |
Model 2 aOR (95% CI) |
Model 3 aOR (95% CI) |
Model 4 aOR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | ||||
| South | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| North | 0.93 (0.64, 1.33) | 1.21 (0.82, 1.79) | 1.62* (1.02, 2.58) | 1.10 (0.72, 1.67) |
| Age | ||||
| 14–19 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 20–24 | 1.68* (1.02,2.75) | 1.62 (0.99,2.64) | 1.37 (0.84,2.25) | 1.27 (0.78,2.07) |
| Number of children | ||||
| 1–3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| None | 0.87 (0.53,1.44) | 0.89 (0.55,1.46) | 0.98 (0.58,1.65) | 0.97 (0.56,1.71) |
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Boyfriend | 3.42***(2.02,5.77) | 2.82***(1.71,4.65) | 2.97***(1.76,4.99) | 1.76*(1.01,3.06) |
| Education | ||||
| None or primary | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Secondary | 0.79 (0.48,1.31) | 0.73 (0.43,1.24) | 0.67 (0.40,1.11) | 0.62 (0.37,1.04) |
| Higher than secondary | 1.63 (0.79,3.37) | 1.49 (0.67,3.32) | 1.16 (0.54,2.48) | 1.02 (0.44,2.39) |
| Wealth | ||||
| Second to fifth quintiles | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| First quintile/Poorest | 0.49** (0.29,0.81) | 0.51* (0.29,0.89) | 0.52* (0.27,0.97 | 0.59 (0.33,1.04) |
| Social norms scale | Not included | 0.90***(0.86,0.95) | 0.92**(0.88,0.97) | 0.95 (0.90,1.00) |
| Motivation scale | Not included | Not included | 1.07***(1.05,1.09) | Not included |
| Ability scale | Not included | Not included | Not included | 1.08***(1.06,1.10) |
| Pseudo R2 | 8.59% | 11.31% | 18.79% | 19.87 |
| Number of women | 618 | 618 | 618 | 618 |
*p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001 aOR Adjusted Odds Ratios; 95%CI 95% Confidence Interval