Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 23;12(5):1600–1619. doi: 10.1039/d0sc05889k

Performance of different 2DFMs in the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR).

Material Type Thickness (nm) TOF (h−1)/potential (V vs. RHE) Faradaic efficiency (%)/potential (V vs. RHE) Tafel slope (mV dec−1) Reference
TCPP(Co)/Zr-BTB MOF 1.9 4768/−0.919 V 85.7 122 155
PcCu-O8-Zn MOF 24 1404/−0.7 88 125 156
Ni(Im)2 MOF 5 770 78.8/−0.85 137 157
MOF-NS-Co MOF 3.16 ± 0.23 11 762 98.7/−0.6 268 158
COF-366-Co COF 350 9400/−0.55 90 470–550 159
Co-TTCOF COF 5 4608/−0.7 99.7 237 160
TT-Por(Co)-COF COF 1.3 91.4/−0.6 161
NiPc-TFPN COF COF 490/−0.9 99.8(±1.24)/−0.9 209.9 162
CoPc-PDQ-COF COF 11 412 96/−0.67 112 163