Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;12(8):2870–2875. doi: 10.1039/d0sc06586b

Optimization of reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d0sc06586b-u1.jpg
Entry Variation from “standard conditions” 4aab (%)
1 No change 97 (95)
2 No [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 Trace
3 No base Trace
4 Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 used instead 96
5 Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 used instead 96
6 [RuCl(p-cymene)(dppe)]Cl used instead 71
7 Cp*Ru(cod)Cl used instead 24
8 Ru(Cp)(PPh3)2Cl used instead 14
9 Ni(cod)2 used instead N.D.
10 [Pd(allyl)Cl]2 used instead N.D.
11 Dppe instead of dmpe 96
12 Dppb instead of dmpe 84
13 Dppf instead of dmpe 66
14 KOH instead of tBuOLi 92
15 K3PO4 instead of tBuOLi 66
16 K2CO3 instead of tBuOLi 12
17 DBU instead of tBuOLi 10
a

Reaction conditions: benzaldehyde 1a (0.4 mmol), hydrazine (0.48 mmol), para-vinyl pyridine 3a (0.2 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (2.5 mol%), ligand (5 mol%) and base (0.1 mmol) in THF (0.5 mL) at 80 °C for 12 h under N2 unless otherwise noted. Note that phenyl hydrazone 2a was generated in situ from benzaldehyde and hydrazine without isolation.

b

The yield of 4aa was determined by 1H NMR using mesitylene as an internal standard and based on 3a (isolated yield of 4aa in parentheses). N.D. = not detected.