Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 2;12(11):4119–4125. doi: 10.1039/d0sc06666d

Optimization of reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d0sc06666d-u1.jpg
Entry Conditions Yield (%)
1 As shown 83 (76b/73c)
2 No photocatalyst N.D.
3 No light N.D.
4 No NiCl2·glyme N.D.
5 No DBU 10
6 No LiCl 54
7 With TEMPO (3.0 equiv.) N.D.
8 ArCl instead of ArBr 76
9 ArI instead of ArBr 16
10d ArOTf instead of ArBr 36
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.15 mmol), 2a (0.10 mmol), [Ir] (1.0 mol%), NiCl2·glyme (5.0 mol%), L (7.5 mol%), DBU (0.10 mmol), LiCl (0.15 mmol), and DMA (0.050 M) irradiated with 34 W blue LEDs. Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis using 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as an internal standard.

b

The reaction was set up using standard Schlenk technique on the benchtop.

c

The reaction was carried out under ambient conditions.

d

Without LiCl. [Ir] = Ir(dFCF3ppy)2(dtbbpy)PF6. dtbbpy = 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine. L = 1,10-phenanthroline. DMA = N,N-dimethylacetamide. TEMPO = (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl. N.D. = not detected.