Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 9;12(12):4484–4493. doi: 10.1039/d0sc06406h

Fig. 2. Numerical modelling output in batch-mode: (A) variation of catalyst C1 concentration from 0.1–1 mM. (B) Variation of catalyst C2 concentration from 0.1–1 mM. (C) Half-lives of the active state (P) for varying catalysts concentrations: C1 0.1–1 mM and C2 0.1–1 mM. (D) Half value of maximum conversion (after maximum) for varying catalysts concentrations: C1 0.1–1 mM and C2 0.1–1 mM. (E) Time (t90) to get back to 90% of reactant R (or 10% left of product P) for varying catalysts concentrations: C1 0.1–1 mM and C2 0.1–0.9 mM. N.B. the first data point in panels (C, D and E) coincide for C1 and C2. Conditions: [F1] = 10 mM, [W1] = 0 mM, [F2] = 10 mM, [W2] = 0 mM, [R] = 5 mM, [P] = 0 mM, [C1] = 0.1–1 mM, [C2] = 0.1–1 mM and rate constants kcat1 = 10 mM−2 h−1, k1 = 0.1 mM−1 h−1, kcat2 = 10 mM−2 h−1, k2 = 0.1 mM−1 h−1.

Fig. 2