Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;3(1):obab005. doi: 10.1093/iob/obab005

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Calculated efficiency versus speed, body size and lunge duration (dots). Cases of the 27 m and 22 m blue whale and 8 m humpback whale listed in Table 1. Other parameters are Uclose from Equation (5), ρprey = 0.18 kg/m3 and f = 1.45. The continuous lines correspond to data fits resulting in FE79.15 Uopen1.40 (27 m blue whale with Tlunge = 77 s), FE54.94 Uopen1.24 (22 m blue; Tlunge = 85 s), and FE17.18 Uopen0.97 (8 m humpback; Tlunge = 47 s); and the dashed lines in FE51.79 Uopen1.20 (27 m blue; Tlunge = 120 s), ∼34.95 Uopen1.03 (22 m blue; Tlunge = 130 s), and ∼9.67 Uopen0.72 (8 m humpback; Tlunge = 85 s). The dashed-double dot curves trace the efficiency without inclusion of the rest-of-body metabolic term (f =0), thereby scaling (exactly) as FE ∼ Mwater/MbodyUopen2.