Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;3(1):obab005. doi: 10.1093/iob/obab005

Table 3.

Metabolic energy expenditures for the prey approach, engulfment and purging stages combined

Specimen/input and output data Humpback whale Blue whale Blue whale Source
L (m) 8 22.73 27.40 Cade et al. (2016)
Bio-logging tag number10 mn160727-11 bw160224-8 bw160727-10 Cade et al. (2016)
Uopen (m/s) 3.56 (0.26) 2.78 (0.13) 3.25 (0.33) Cade et al. (2016) and Fig. 3; SD from tag data.
Uclose (m/s) 2.19 (0.55) 1.19 (0.15) 1.33 (0.36) Equation (5); SD from mass data
cetER (kW) 5 25 40 cetER = f 4.1 M0.75
cetER energy (kJ) 232 2111 3116 Equation (9) previous row times lunge duration
Equations (9) with previous row with f =1.45;
Single lunge expenditure E1lunge (kJ) 515 4080 8217 Ustart = Uclose (Equation (5)
656 4465 9085 Ustart = Uclose = 1.5 m/s
614 3982 7894 Ustart = Uclose = 0.7 m/s
Etotal/Tlunge; via Equation (9).
Power (kW) expended during a single lunge 11 48 107 Ustart = Uclose (Equation (5)
14 53 118 Ustart = Uclose = 1.5 m/s
13 47 103 Ustart = Uclose = 0.7 m/s
Prey energy (kJ) 3380 61,307 125,937 In a single “gulp” Equation (11)
Equation (1);
FE (single lunge) 7 14 14 Ustart = Uclose (Equation (5)
5 15 15 Ustart = Uclose = 1.5 m/s
6 15 16 Ustart = Uclose = 0.7 m/s

The input values are the same as in Table 2. Calculations omitting shape drag are shown in the first row of cells containing triple entries. SDs are shown in parentheses.