Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 5;11:349. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01473-w

Table 1.

Structural neuroimaging-genetics studies in ADHD.

Genes Index variants Groups MRI Imaging matrix Results References
SLC6A3 3’ UTR intron 8 VNTR haplotype Three SLC6A3 alleles (10/10 genotype, and the haplotypes 10–6 and 9–6) sMRI Bilateral striatal volumes (nucleus accumbens, CN, and putamen) Adult ADHD 9–6 haplotype carriers ↑ 5.9% larger striatum volume relative to participants not carrying this haplotype. Onnink et al.130
3’ UTR VNTR 10R/10R carriers vs. 9R carriers sMRI Cingulate cortex thickness 10R/10R carriers: ↑ thickness in right cingulated gyrus and right BA 24. Fernandez-Jaen et al.131
3’ UTR VNTR 10R/10R carriers vs. 9R carriers sMRI PFC thickness 10R/10R carriers: ↓ cortical thickness in right BA 46 (lateral PFC). Fernandez-Jaen et al.129
3’ UTR VNTR 9R carriers vs. 10R/10R carriers, 4R/4R carriers vs. rest sMRI PFC GM and CN volume SLC6A3 ADHD 10/10R carriers: ↓ CN volumes Durston et al.175
3’ UTR and intron 8 VNTR haplotype 10–6 haplotype carriers vs. non-10–6 haplotype carriers, 7R carriers vs. non-7R carriers sMRI Striatum, frontal cortex, and hippocampus volumes SLC6A3 10–6 haplotype carriers: ↓ left striatal volume, irrespective of treatment. Schweren et al.134
3’ UTR VNTR 9R carriers vs. 10R/10R carriers sMRI CN volume 9R carriers: ↑ volumes of CN. Shook et al.176
3’ UTR VNTR, exon 3 VNTR, rs4680 9R carriers vs.10R/10R carriers; 4R/4R carriers vs.“rest DTI WM integrity, FA values SLC6A3 9R carriers: no effect on WM integrity DRD4 4R/4R carriers: no effect on WM integrity Hong et al.140
COMT rs4680 Met carriers vs. Val/Val carriers sMRI Striatum, cerebellum, temporal lobe and IFG volume ADHD Met carriers: ↓ GM volume. ADHD Val/Val: ↑ GM volume in right CN compared to ADHD Met carriers and HC. Villemonteix et al.135
rs4686 Met carriers vs. Val/Val carriers sMRI GM volume ADHD Met carriers: ↓ GM volume in left putamen. Shimada et al.136
rs4680 Met carriers vs. Val/Val carriers DTI FA and RD values ADHD Val/Val: ↓ FA and ↑ RD in the right cingulum (cingulated gyrus) compared to ADHD Met carriers and HC Val/Val. Kabukcu Basay et al.141
rs4680 Met carriers vs. Val/Val carriers DTI WM integrity, FA values Met carriers: ↓ Network of WM connections linking 18” brain regions Hong et al.140
DRD4 exon 3 VNTR 7R carriers vs. non-7R carriers sMRI Superior and middle frontal, anterior cingulate, and cerebellum cortices volumes 7R carriers: ↓ volumes of the superior frontal cortex and cerebellum cortex compared to non-carriers. Monuteaux et al.133
exon 3 VNTR 9R carriers vs. rest, 7R carriers vs. rest, S-allele carriers vs. rest sMRI Total GM, caudate, and putamen volume Putamen volume, DRD4 7R carriers showed opposite age relations. Richards et al.153
exon 3 VNTR 7R carriers vs. non-7R carriers sMRI TBV, PFC, cerebellum, CN, and pallidum volume No volumetric differences between 7R and non-7R carriers. No group × genotype interactions. Castellanos et al.177
exon 3 VNTR 9R carriers vs. 10R/10R carriers, 4R/4R carriers vs. rest sMRI PFC GM and CN volume DRD4 unaffected siblings 7R carriers: ↑ prefrontal GM volume. Durston et al.177
exon 3 VNTR 10–6 haplotype carriers vs. non-10–6 haplotype carriers, 7R carriers vs. non-7R carriers sMRI Striatum, frontal cortex, and hippocampus volumes DRD4 7R carriers: frontal cortex volume is associated with stimulant treatment at a younger age. Schweren et al.134
exon 3 VNTR 9R carriers vs.10R/10R carriers; 4R/4R carriers vs. rest DTI WM integrity, FA values DRD4 4R/4R carriers: no effect on WM integrity Hong et al.140
SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR S carriers vs. LL carriers sMRI GM volume S carriers: stress exposure is associated with ↓ GM volume in the precentral gyrus, middle and superior frontal gyri, frontal pole, and cingulated gyrus. Association of GxE interaction with ADHD symptom count was mediated by GM volume in frontal pole and anterior cingulated gyrus only. van der Meer et al.178
5-HTTLPR S-allele carriers vs. rest sMRI GM volume ↑ positive relation between stress exposure and ADHD severity; Interactions were reflected in GM volume of cerebellum, parahippocampal gyrus, intracalcarine cortex,and angular gyrus. van der Meer et al.179
5-HTTLPR S-allele carriers vs. rest sMRI Total GM, caudate, and putamen volume For total GM, differential age effects were found for SLC6A4 L/L carriers, depending on the amount of positive peer affiliation. Richards et al.153
SLC6A3 SLC6A3 3’ UTR VNTR; HTTLPR 9R carriers vs. rest, 7R carriers vs. rest, S-allele carriers vs. rest sMRI Total GM, caudate, and putamen volume For total GM, differential age effects were found for SLC6A3 9R- and SLC6A4 L/L carriers, depending on the amount of positive peer affiliation. Richards et al.153
3’ UTR VNTR, exon 3 VNTR, rs4532 9R carriers vs. 10R/10R carriers, 7R carriers vs. non-7R carriers, C-allele carriers vs. non-C-allele carriers sMRI Cortical thickness SLC6A3 9R carriers: No effect. DRD4 7R carriers: thinner right orbitofrontal/inferior prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex. ADHD 7R carriers: distinct trajectory of cortical development; normalization of the right parietal cortical region. Shaw et al.132
SLC6A2 rs4532; rs265981, rs998424, rs3785157 2 and 3 genotype groups per SNP sMRI TCV, volumes of total GM and WM, CN, cerebellum, frontal, temporal, parietal lobes NET1 SNPs: no genotype effects on GM or WM volume and no group × genotype interactions. Bobb et al.180
DRD1 3’ UTR VNTR, exon 3 VNTR, rs4532 9R carriers vs. 10R/10R carriers, 7R carriers vs. non-7R carriers, C-allele carriers vs. non-C-allele carriers sMRI Cortical thickness DRD1: no effect of genotype on the clinical outcome or cortical development. Shaw et al.132
rs4532; rs265981, rs998424, rs3785157 2 and 3 genotype groups per SNP sMRI TCV, volumes of total GM and WM, CN, cerebellum, frontal, temporal, parietal lobes DRD1 and NET1 SNPs: No genotype effects on GM or WM volume and no group × genotype interactions. Bobb et al.180
NOS1 exon 1f-VNTR SS carriers vs. SL/LL carriers DTI WM integrity, FA and MD values Female SS carriers: ↑ MD in right parietal WM tracts. Males: no difference between genotype groups. No genotype × diagnostic group interaction. van Ewijk et al.181
ADRA2A rs1800544, rs553668 C-allele carriers vs. GG carriers, T-allele carriers vs. CC carriers DTI White matter integrity, FA values rs1800544 C-allele carriers: ↓ FA in the right postcentral gyrus. rs553668 T-allele carriers: ↓FA in the right middle frontal cortex. Park et al.182
NR3C1 5-HTTLPR, rs6189, rs6198 S-allele carriers vs. rest; NR3C1 risk haplotype carriers (rs6189G and rs6198G) vs. rest sMRI GM volume NR3C1 risk haplotype carriers: ↑ positive relation between stress exposure and ADHD severity van der Meer et al.179