Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 1;34(3):228–237. doi: 10.37201/req/019.2021

Table 2.

Activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam in non-ESBL and ESBL producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates resistant to amoxicillin/ clavulanate (AMC), piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T), meropenem (MER) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) in the SMART study (2016 and 2017) in Spain.

Microorganisms ESBL (No.) Antimicrobial No. (% of resistant isolates) Ceftolozane-tazobactam
Susceptible
No. (%)
Resistant
No. (%)
Escherichia coli Negative (318)a AMCa 52 (16.3) 50 (96.1) 2 (3.9)
Positive (29)a 16 (55.1) 14 (87.5) 2 (12.5)
Negative (1322) P/T 85 (6.4) 78 (91.7) 7 (8.3)
Positive (125) 23 (18.4) 19 (82.6) 4 (17.4)
Negative (1322) MER 0 (0) -- --
Positive (125) 0 (0) -- --
Negative (1322) CIP 331 (25) 325 (98.2) 6 (1.8)
Positive (125) 110 (88) 106 (96.4) 4 (3.6)
Klebsiella pneumoniae Negative (62)a AMCa 5 (8.0) 5 (100) 0 (0)
Positive (19)a 9 (47.3) 3 (33.3) 6 (66.6)
Negative (397) P/T 39 (9.8) 31 (79.5) 8 (20.5)
Positive (174) 129 (74.1) 32 (24.8) 97 (75.2)
Negative (397) MER 5 (1.2) 0 (0) 5 (100)
Positive (174) 11 (6.3) 0 (0) 11 (100)
Negative (397) CIP 48 (12.0) 41 (85.4) 7 (14.6)
Positive (174) 164 (94.2) 69 (42.1) 95 (57.9)
a

AMC: data are only from 2017