Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 23;34(3):193–199. doi: 10.37201/req/109.2020

Table 3a.

Evaluation of the SFC in bacteremia caused by a single microorganism.

Microorganism Identificationa Resistance detection to cephalosporins 3rd (ESBL) Resistance detection to carbapenems (carbapenemases)
Escherichia coli(n= 38) Right (38/38) 100% (38/38) 100%
Klebsiellapneumoniae(n= 9) Right (9/9) 100% (9/9) 100%
Klebsiella oxytoca(n=4) Partial) (4/4) 100% (4/4) 100%
Proteus mirabilis(n=2) Partial (2/2) 100% (2/2) 100%
Enterobacter cloacae(n=2) Partial (0/2) 0% (2/2) 100%
Stenotrophomonasmaltophilia(n=2) Right (0/2) 0% (0/2) 0%
Serratiamarcescens(n=2) Partial (1/2) 50% (2/2) 100%
Achromobacterxyloxosidans(n=1) No identification (0/1) 0% (1/1) 100%
Citrobacterkoseri(n=1) Partial (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100%
Bacteroidesthetaiotamicon(n=1) No identification (0/1) 0% (1/1) 100%
Campylobacterjejuni(n=1) No identification (0/1) 0% (1/1) 100%
Acinetobacterbaumannii(n=1) Right (0/1) 0% (1/1) 100%
Pseudomonasaeruginosa(n=1) Right (0/1) 0% (1/1) 100%
TOTAL (n=65) Right: 51 (78.5%)
Partial: 13 (20%)
No identification: 3 (4.6%)
Sensibility ESBL: 100%
Global data: 55/65 (84.6%)
Sensibility: 64/65 (98.5%)

SFC: Sepsis Chip Flow system; ESBL: extended-spectrum beta-lactamase

a

Right: Identification was made correctly: species and gender; Partial: Only the presence of an enterobacteria was identified. The genus and species were unknown; No identification: The identification of the microorganism was not achieved