Table 7.
Parameters measured2 |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Treatments1 | Body weight gain (BWG, kg/bird)3 | Feed intake (FI, kg/bird) | FCR4 (Kg:Kg) |
CON | 2.35b | 3.54ab | 1.511abc |
BMD | 2.40b | 3.46ab | 1.442dc |
SDP | 2.23b | 3.23b | 1.455bc |
CON-SE | 2.54ab | 4.00a | 1.581ab |
BMD-SE | 2.92a | 3.83ab | 1.311d |
SDP-SE | 2.17b | 3.48ab | 1.606a |
P-value | 0.0030 | 0.0113 | 0.0001 |
Pooled SEM (24) | 0.104 | 0.126 | 0.029 |
Diet effect means | |||
CON | 2.44ab | 3.77a | 1.546a |
BMD | 2.66a | 3.65ab | 1.377b |
SDP | 2.20b | 3.35b | 1.531a |
Pooled SEM | 0.073 | 0.089 | 0.020 |
Salmonellachallenge effect means | |||
NC5 | 2.33b | 3.41b | 1.470 |
SE | 2.54a | 3.77a | 1.500 |
Pooled SEM | 0.060 | 0.073 | 0.017 |
Sources of variation | Probability | ||
Dietary treatment | 0.0028 | 0.0171 | 0.0001 |
Challenge1 | 0.0250 | 0.0045 | NS |
Diet x Challenge | 0.0490 | NS | 0.0012 |
a-dMean values bearing different superscript letters within a column are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Treatment CON consisted of chicks fed unmedicated corn-soybean meal (SBM) basal without SDP; Treatment BMD consisted of chicks given unmedicated corn-SBM basal into which bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) was added at 0.055 g/kg diet; Treatment SDP consisted of chicks given unmedicated corn-SBM basal into which SDP was added at 30 g/kg diet; Treatments CON-SE, BMD-SE, and SDP-SE, consisted of chicks that were given diets similar to CON, BMD, and SDP, respectively, and were each inoculated with 7.48 × 108 CFU Salmonella Enteritidis /mL at 1 d of age.
Values represent the mean of 4 replicate pens per treatment.
Values are based only on weight of live birds.
FCR = feed conversion ratio calculated as feed-to-gain ratio and adjusted for mortality by including the gains of dead birds in the calculations.
NC = non-challenged treatments. This represents pooled mean of treatments in which chicks were not challenged with Salmonella spp. These treatments are CON, BMD, and SDP. NS, not significant.