TABLE 3.

Mismatch distribution analysis and neutrality tests within Chamaesium based on cpDNA and ITS.

Species	Tajima’s D (p)	Fu’s Fs (p)	SSD (p)	Hrag (p)
cpDNA
C. delavayi	–	–	–	–
C. jiulongense	0	0	0	0
C. mallaeanum	–	–	–	–
C. novem-jugum	1.317 (0.905)	2.520 (0.877)	0.224 (0.125)	0.755 (0.085)
C. paradoxum	0.346 (0.990)	0.266 (N.A.)	0.008 (0.038)	0.076 (0.033)
C. spatuliferum	0.284 (0.968)	0.538 (N.A.)	0.040 (0.042)	0.128 (0.095)
C. thalictrifolium	0.543 (0.960)	1.206 (N.A.)	0.059 (0.063)	0.220 (0.109)
C. viridiflorum	0.863 (0.954)	1.563 (N.A.)	0.147 (0.050)	0.470 (0.060)
C. wolffianum	0.597 (0.696)	1.573 (0.567)	0.199 (0.080)	0.451 (0.183)
All	0.446 (0.969)	0.744 (N.A.)	0.052 (0.055)	0.174 (0.092)
nrDNA
C. delavayi	0	0	0	0
C. jiulongense	0	0	0	0
C. mallaeanum	–	–	–	–
C. novem-jugum	1.780 (0.667)	0.865 (0.603)	0.373 (0.304)	0.007 (0.255)
C. paradoxum	0.291 (0.876)	0.616 (N.A.)	0.038 (0.076)	0.234 (0.141)
C. spatuliferum	0.234 (0.822)	0.851 (N.A.)	0.047 (0.144)	0.184 (0.217)
C. thalictrifolium	0.151 (0.879)	0.313 (N.A.)	0.022 (0.096)	0.155 (0.137)
C. viridiflorum	0.170 (0.972)	0.125 (N.A.)	0.006 (0.054)	0.058 (0.072)
C. wolffianum	0.916 (0.955)	0.665 (N.A.)	0.024 (0.080)	0.212 (0.067)
All	0.231 (0.882)	0.550 (N.A.)	0.039 (0.101)	0.154 (0.173)