Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 22;29(3):136–146. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1822618

Table 2.

Methodological assessment of randomized controlled trials included in the systematic review using the PEDro scale and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool

PEDro Criterion Llamas-Ramos et al. 2014 Sobhani
et al. 2014
Campa-Moran
et al. 2015
Segura-Orti
et. al 2016
De Meulemeester
et al. 2017
Ziaeifar
et al. 2017
Eligibility criteria specified Y N Y N Y Y
Random allocation Y Y Y Y Y Y
Concealed allocation Y N N Y Y N
Baseline comparability Y Y Y Y Y Y
Blinding of subjects N N N N N N
Blinding of therapists N N N N N N
Blinding of assessors Y Y Y Y Y N
Adequate follow-up Y N Y N Y N
Intention to treat Y N Y N N N
Between-group comparison Y Y Y Y Y Y
Point estimates and variability Y Y Y Y Y Y
Total Score 8/10 5/10 7/10 6/10 7/10 4/10
Cochrane risk-of-bias Llamas-Ramos et al. 2014 Sobhani
et al. 2014
Campa-Moran
et al. 2015
Segura-Orti
et. al 2016
De Meulemeester
et al. 2017
Ziaeifar
et al. 2017
Selection bias
Random sequence generation
Low Low Low Low Low Low
Selection bias
Allocation concealment
Low Unclear Unclear Low Low High
Reporting bias
Selective reporting
Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear
Other bias
Other sources of bias
Low Low Low Low Low Low
Performance bias
Blinding (participants and personnel)
Low Unclear Unclear Low Low Unclear
Detection bias
Blinding (outcome assessment)
Low Low Low Low Low High
Attrition bias
Incomplete outcome data
Low Low Low Low Low Low
Overall RoB Some concerns * Some concerns* Some concerns* Some concerns* Some concerns High risk

Y = Yes, N = No, RoB = risk of bias, *required a 3rd reviewer