Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;53(2):73–78. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20155

Table 1.

Demographic, Radiological, Surgical, and Histological Characteristics of Patients who Underwent Surgery for Giant Intracranial Meningioma

Patient no. Age (years)/sex Location Size (cm) Origin Resection grade (Simpson grade) Histological diagnosis
1 30/Male Left frontal 7 × 5.2 × 6 Falx cerebri Grade 1 Meningioma WHO grade I
2 49/Male Olfactory groove (skull base) 5.7 × 4.2 × 5 Anterior skull base dura Grade 2 Meningioma WHO grade I
3 82/Male Right posterior parietal 4.6 × 6 × 5.3 Convexity dura Grade 1 Meningioma WHO grade II
4 78/Male Anterior clinoid (skull base) 5 × 6 × 6 Skull base dura Grade 2 Meningioma WHO grade I
5 83/Male Right frontal 6.7 × 5.5 × 6.3 Convexity dura Grade 1 Meningioma WHO grade I
6 53/Female Left frontoparietal 6.4 × 7.8 × 5.6 Falx cerebri Grade 1 Meningioma WHO grade I
7 70/Female Left posterior parietal 7 × 5 × 7 Convexity dura Grade 1 Meningioma WHO grade I
8 70/Female Left temporal fossa 7.3 × 7.1 × 5.1 Sphenoid wing dura Grade 2 Meningioma WHO grade I
9 72/Male Left frontal 7.3 × 6.8 Convexity dura Grade 1 Meningioma WHO grade II
10 62/Male Right temporal fossa 6.5 × 5.5 Skull base dura Grade 2 Meningioma WHO grade II

WHO, World Health Organization.