Table 2. Statistical difference analysis of clinical and laboratory features between acute purulent appendicitis and gangrenous or perforated appendicitis.
Variable | Sample | Acute purulent appendicitis | Gangrenous or perforated appendicitis | Statisticsa | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years, mean ± SD) | 127 | 42.16±17.34 | 40.54±15.31 | 0.419 | 0.676 |
Gender | |||||
M | 68 | 56 (53.40%) | 12 (54.17%) | 0.005 | 0.948 |
F | 59 | 48 (46.15%) | 11 (45.83%) | ||
Abdominal pain scoreb [1–10] | |||||
2 | 6 | 6 (5.77%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0.142 | 0.707 |
3 | 9 | 7 (6.73%) | 2 (8.33%) | ||
4 | 15 | 12 (11.54%) | 3 (12.50%) | ||
5 | 21 | 15 (14.56%) | 5 (20.83%) | ||
6 | 1 | 1 (0.96%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
7 | 37 | 31 (29.81%) | 6 (25.00%) | ||
8 | 16 | 13 (12.50%) | 3 (12.50%) | ||
9 | 19 | 16 (15.38%) | 3 (12.50%) | ||
10 | 4 | 2 (1.94%) | 2 (8.33%) | ||
Nausea and vomiting score [0–2] | |||||
0 | 31 | 24 (23.08%) | 7 (29.17%) | 1.671 | 0.196 |
1 | 65 | 59 (57.28%) | 6 (25.00%) | ||
2 | 31 | 20 (19.23%) | 11 (45.83%) | ||
Abdominal pain type [1–3] | |||||
1 | 101 | 80 (77.67%) | 20 (83.33%) | 0.385 | 0.535 |
2 | 25 | 21 (20.19%) | 4 (16.67%) | ||
3 | 2 | 2 (1.94%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
Abdominal tenderness range [1–10] | |||||
1 | 25 | 20 (19.23%) | 5 (20.83%) | 1.738 | 0.187 |
2 | 18 | 15 (14.56%) | 3 (12.50%) | ||
3 | 49 | 43 (41.75%) | 5 (20.83%) | ||
4 | 5 | 3 (2.91%) | 2 (8.33%) | ||
5 | 1 | 1 (0.97%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
6 | 1 | 1 (0.97%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
7 | 2 | 2 (1.94%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
8 | 5 | 5 (4.85%) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
9 | 22 | 13 (12.62%) | 9 (37.50%) | ||
Abdominal pain time (hours, mean ± SD) | 127 | 23.80±14.90 | 36.00±14.26 | −3.641 | <0.001* |
Highest temperature (°C, mean ± SD) | 127 | 37.46±0.80 | 38.04±0.94 | −3.094 | 0.002* |
WBC counts (×109) (mean ± SD) | 127 | 13.73±4.23 | 15.26±3.33 | −1.656 | 0.1 |
NE% (mean ± SD) | 127 | 85.03±7.02 | 87.09±4.63 | −1.76 | 0.084 |
CD3+ (%, mean ± SD) | 127 | 65.47±8.52 | 64.37±12.17 | 0.525 | 0.6 |
CD4+ (%, mean ± SD) | 127 | 34.21±7.98 | 31.70±7.23 | 1.409 | 0.161 |
CD8+ (%, mean ± SD) | 127 | 27.16±8.20 | 34.71±10.67 | −3.83 | <0.001* |
CD19+ (%, mean ± SD) | 127 | 17.53±7.50 | 17.98±7.37 | -0.263 | 0.793 |
CD16+56- (%, mean ± SD) | 127 | 15.32±8.54 | 13.72±9.36 | 0.813 | 0.418 |
Total T cell counts (µL, mean ± SD) | 127 | 880.42±494.62 | 835.49±418.38 | 0.412 | 0.681 |
Helper T cell counts (µL, mean ± SD) | 127 | 469.24±281.09 | 396.50±213.86 | 1.189 | 0.237 |
Inhibitor T (µL, mean ± SD) | 127 | 358.03±220.44 | 396.88±252.29 | −0.756 | 0.451 |
B cell counts (µL, mean ± SD) | 127 | 224.89±130.69 | 203.17±90.04 | 0.772 | 0.442 |
NK cell counts (L, mean ± SD) | 127 | 199.96±150.11 | 166.75±97.37 | 1.033 | 0.304 |
CD4+/CD8+ (mean ± SD) | 127 | 1.45±0.71 | 1.22±0.65 | 1.423 | 0.157 |
CRP, mg/L (mean ± SD) | 127 | 52.10±51.72 | 103.85±72.48 | −4.068 | <0.001* |
PCT, ng/L (mean ± SD) | 127 | 1.44±4.70 | 4.46±9.21 | −1.559 | 0.131 |
P value <0.05 indicated statistical significance. * indicated statistical significance. aFisher’s exact test was used for the nominal variable. Wilcoxon test was used for the ordinal variable, whose statistics is W. Student’s t test was used for the continuous variable with abnormal distribution, whose statistics is t. bIt is same to Table 1. SD, standard deviation; WBC, white blood cell; NE, neutrophil; PCT, procalcitonin; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.