Table 5.
Literature review on European experiences in robotic rectal surgery
| Author | Type of study | Year | City | Number of patients | Years of analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D’Annibale et al. [41] | Retrospective | 2004 | Padua | 10 RRR | 2001–2003 |
| Bianchi et al. [39] | Retrospective | 2010 | Milan | 25 RRR vs 25 LRR | 2008–2009 |
| D’Annibale et al. [25] | Retrospective | 2013 | Rome | 50 RRR vs 50 LRR | 2006–2012 |
| Colombo et al. [40] | Retrospective | 2015 | France | 60 RRR vs 60 LRR | 2009–2013 |
| Allemann et al. [15] | Retrospective | 2015 | Switzerland | 20 RRR vs 46 LRR vs 7 ORR | 2012–2014 |
| Valverde et al. [37] | Retrospective | 2016 | France | 65 RRR vs 65 LRR | 2013–2016 |
| Morelli et al. [42] | Retrospective | 2016 | Pisa | 50 RRR vs 25 LRR | 2009–2014 |
| Spinelli et al. [44] | Retrospective | 2017 | Milan | 12 RRR | 2015–2016 |
| Rouanet et al. [43] | Retrospective | 2018 | France | 200 RRR vs 200 LRR | 2008–2015 |