Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2021 Mar 4;71:102026. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102026

Table 4. Comparison of the prediction models to predict a WM-2bk-acc score.

The prediction performance was reported in terms of RMSE and correlation coefficient (r) between actual and predicted scores. The values were reported as format of mean ± standard deviation. The performance measurements were computed from 1,000 bootstrap samples.

Functional Network FNPearson FNPartial FNgl FNsimplex

r 0.059 ± 0.155 0.142 ± 0.116 0.257 ± 0.113 0.263 ± 0.090
RMSE 11.85 ± 4.59 10.40 ± 1.12 10.40 ± 1.33 10.95 ± 1.58

Functional + Structural SN + FNPearson SN + FNPartial SN + FNgl SFNagl SFNsimplex

r 0.255 ± 0.131 0.195 ± 0.151 0.241 ± 0.168 0.299 ± 0.114 0.304 ± 0.098
RMSE 4.98 ± 1.88 9.52 ± 1.89 9..45 ± 1.85 10.60 ± 1.53 10.47 ± 1.39

Structural Network SN

r 0.281 ± 0.099
RMSE 10.60 ± 1.40