Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2021 Mar 21;71:102041. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102041

Table 1.

Quantitative comparison of CBCT and MRI segmentation results using DSC and ASD(mm). Best results are marked in red. Underline means supervised training with ground truth segmentation on the target domain, i.e. CBCT or MRI segmentation. The negative sign ‘-’ means without the corresponding loss component in our APA2Seg-Net.

CBCT CycGAN+SegCT SegCBCT Ours-Idt Ours-MD-CC Ours-CC Ours-MD Ours
Median DSC 0.685 0.882 0.877 0.870 0.878 0.887 0.903
Mean±Std DSC 0.695 ± 0.092 0.874 ± 0.035 0.873 ± 0.056 0.862 ± 0.051 0.871 ± 0.051 0.882 ± 0.038 0.893 ± 0.034
Median ASD 10.144 9.190 6.863 7.289 5.918 6.476 5.882
Mean±Std ASD 10.697 ± 2.079 10.742 ± 4.998 6.948 ± 2.138 7.459 ± 2.769 5.971 ± 1.823 6.086 ± 1.415 5.886 ± 1.517
MRI CycGAN+SegCT SegMRI Ours-Idt Ours-MD-CC Ours-CC Ours-MD Ours
Median DSC 0.907 0.907 0.913 0.915 0.917 0.916 0.918
Mean±Std DSC 0.900 ± 0.044 0.859 ± 0.102 0.914 ± 0.028 0.912 ± 0.029 0.917 ± 0.026 0.916 ± 0.025 0.921 ± 0.022
Median ASD 1.632 2.838 1.619 1.681 1.498 1.532 1.491
Mean±Std ASD 2.328 ± 2.070 3.660 ± 2.522 1.932 ± 1.303 1.916 ± 1.142 1.976 ± 1.311 2.047 ± 1.382 1.860 ± 1.099