Table 4.
The learning curve of RPD from different time period and population
| Author | Periods | Year | Case no | BMI, kg/m2 mean (SD) | Operative time | CR-POPF rate | Statistic method | The case passing learning curve | Nationality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boone et al. | 2008–2014 | 2015 | 200 | 28 ± 5 | 483 ± 113 | 8.5% | CUSUM | 80 | U.S |
| Napoli et al. | 2008–2014 | 2016 | 70 | 23.6 | 522 ± 98 | 16.7% | CUSUM | 33 | Italy |
| Shi et al. | 2010–2018 | 2019 | 450 | 23.1 ± 3.5 | 309 ± 87 | 9.8% | CUSUM | 100 | China |
| Zhang et al. | 2012–2016 | 2018 | 100 | 23.8 ± 3.6 | 358 ± 93 | 11% | CUSUM | 40 | China |
| Shyr et al. | 2014–2017 | 2018 | 61 | 24 ± 3.7 | 438 ± 141 | 22.9% | CUSUM | 20 | Taiwan |
| Chao et al. | 2015–2020 | Current study | 68 | 24.6 ± 3.7 | 317 ± 67 | 17.6% | CUSUM | 18 | Taiwan |