Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;28(7):3863–3870. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09388-4

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Characteristic Total patients (%)
(n = 44)
Patients who underwent conversion surgey (%)
(n = 20)
Age (years) 64 (37–77)a 68 (38–74)a
Gender
 Male 24 (55%) 11 (55%)
 Female 20 (45%) 9 (45%)
ECOG performance status
 0 37 (84%) 19 (95%)
 1 5 (11%) 1 (5%)
 2 1 (2%) 0 (0%)
Previous chemotherapy
 Received 3 (7%) 1 (5%)
 Not received 41 (93%) 19 (95%)
Macroscopic type
 Type 4 (diffuse infiltrative) 29 (66%) 11 (55%)
 Non-type 4 15 (34%) 9 (45%)
Histological type
 Differentiated 3 (7%) 1 (5%)
 Mixed 9 (21%) 4 (20%)
 Undifferentiated 32 (73%) 15 (75%)
Extent of peritoneal metastases (JCGC 12th edition)b
 P0CY1 2 (5%) 2 (10%)
 P1 5 (11%) 5 (25%)
 P2 5 (11%) 2 (10%)
 P3 32 (73%) 11 (55%)
PCI score 14 (0–39)a 6 (0–25)a
 0–9 19 13
 10–20 10 5
 21–39 15 2
Peritoneal cytology (CY)
 Positive 29 (66%) 11 (55%)
 Negative 15 (34%) 9 (45%)
Other distant metastasis
 Ovary 2 (5%) 0 (0%)
 Para-aortic lymph nodes 1 (2%) 0 (0%)
 Absent 41 (93%) 20 (100%)

aShown as media (range)

bCY1 peritoneal cytology findings positive for carcinoma cells

ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, JCGC Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, P0 no peritoneal metastasis, P1 metastases immediately adjacent to the stomach, P2 several scattered metastases within the peritoneal cavity, P3 numerous metastases throughout the peritoneal cavity, PCI peritoneal cancer index