Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Dec 8;39(6):459–465. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000803

TABLE 3.

Relationship Between EEG Features and Drug Resistance Stratified by Sleep and Wakefulness

Feature Responsive Patients
With Feature, N (%)
Resistant Patients
With Feature, N (%)
OR of Resistant-To-Responsive
(95% CI)
P
GSW awake 51 (70.8) 22 (71.0) 1.0 (0.4–2.5) 1.0
GSW asleep 47 (65.3) 26 (83.9) 2.8 (0.9–8.1) 0.06
PSW awake 19 (26.4) 14 (45.2) 2.3 (1.0–5.5) 0.07
PSW asleep 35 (48.6) 18 (58.1) 1.5 (0.6–3.4) 0.40
GPT awake 3 (4.2) 5 (16.1) 4.4 (1.0–19.8) 0.05
GPT asleep 6 (8.3) 8 (25.8) 3.8 (1.2–12.2) 0.03
GPFA awake 4 (5.6) 4 (12.9) 2.5 (0.6–10.8) 0.24
GPFA asleep 1 (1.4) 4 (12.9) 10.5 (1.1–98.4) 0.03
GPT or GPFA awake 4 (5.6) 6 (19.4) 4.1 (1.1–15.7) 0.06
GPT or GPFA asleep 6 (8.3) 9 (29.0) 4.5 (1.4–14.1) 0.01
GLVFA awake 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
GLVFA asleep 0 (0.0) 2 (6.5) 0.09
Focal discharges awake 0 (0.0) 3 (9.7) 0.03
Focal discharges asleep 1 (1.4) 0 (0.0) 1.0
Focal slowing awake 3 (4.2) 2 (6.5) 1.6 (0.3–10.0) 0.64
Focal slowing asleep 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

A higher OR implies greater prevalence of the feature in drug-resistant patients.

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; GLVFA, generalized low-voltage fast activity; GPFA, generalized paroxysmal fast activity; GPT, generalized polyspike train; GSW, generalized spike–wave; OR, odds ratio; PSW, polyspike-and-wave; —, not estimable.