Table 2.
Risk assessment and control strategy for AQbD-enabled development UHPLC-PDA method for Genkwa Flos.
| Potential failure cause | Failure effect | Risk mitigation | P | S | D | RPN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection volume* | Change the peak resolutions and S/N | Optimized by DoE and control | 3 | 2 | 3 | 18 |
| Sample stability | Change in peak resolutions and S/N | Ascertain the stability of prepared sample solutions | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Mobile phase | Change in peak symmetry and chromatography | At least four mobile phases were tested | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Columns | Lot variability may change | At least three columns were tested | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Vials | Exposure to light results in an increase of impurity | Amber vials to be used | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Humidity | Change in weighing | Standard operating procedures to be followed to dry the samples | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Column temperature* | Changes in peak resolutions, elute time, and S/N | Optimized by DoE and control | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 |
| Sample temperature | May change the peak resolutions | Control autosampler temperature at 20℃ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Misidentification of peaks | Incorrect values reported | Training, example chromatograph | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Gradient slope* | Changes in whole chromatography | Optimized by DoE and control | 4 | 2 | 3 | 24 |
| Flow rate* | Changes in peak resolutions and elute time | Optimized by DoE and control | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 |
| Instrument model | Changes in whole chromatography | UHPLC system was selected | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
S/N signal to noise, DoE design of experiments, P probability, S severity, D detectability.
Risk priority number (RPN) = Severity Probability Detectability.
*High risk factors selected by upper 10 RPN.