Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;11:639438. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.639438

Table 3.

The characteristics of the included studies.

Study Country Ethnicity Male, N (%) Age (mean ± SD or mean [25th, 75th percentile]) Cases Controls Genotype (CC/TC/TT) Genotyping method Adjustment HWE NOS score*
Case Control
Thabet (2016) (8) Multi-country Caucasian Case: NA; Control: 1101 (64.5) Case: NA; Control: 44.9 (38–52) 75 1706 24/35/16 16/531/822 TaqMan Age, gender, BMI and Child-Pugh score 0.288 9
Stickel (2018) (9) Switzerland Mixed Case: 679 (90); Control: 817 (70) Case: 61 ± 10; Control: 55 ± 10 751 1165 203/363/185 185/314/583 TaqMan Age, gender, BMI, and type II diabetes mellitus 0.934 7
Raksayot (2019) (10) Thailand NA Case: 424 (0.8); Control: 77 (73.3) HBV-HCC: 62.1 ± 7.8, HCV-HCC: 62.2 ± 7.5, NBNC-HCC: 63.3 ± 9.3; Control: 50.7 ± 4.6 530 105 279/213/38 38/66/34 TaqMan No 0.818 6
This study China Chinese Case: 550 (70.6); Control: 966 (68.4) Case: 53.2 ± 12.5; Control: 52.3 ± 12.2 779 1412 426/295/58 58/800/528 Massary Age, sex, smoking and drinking status 0.403 7

*NOS score ≥ 7 is often considered as high-quality.