Table 4.
Lessons learned regarding prioritizing pandemic research using mixed methods
| 1. | Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) played a major role in the current pandemic and should be empowered to do so in future pandemics with sufficient funding. |
| 2. | Funding from benefactors/donors, institution, industry, National Institutes of Health/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and state were important sources for COVID-19 research. However, Clinical and Translational Science Institute funding made the greatest impact on infrastructure. |
| 3. | Developing laboratory services, new diagnostics, biosafety level 2 to 3 laboratories, and biorepositories is essential in the preparedness of a pandemic. |
| 4. | Most institutions can shut down their regular activity and engage their workforce in pandemic research instead. |
| 5. | Flexible staff hiring and overtime are needed to facilitate enrollment into studies. Early engagement of human resources is essential. |
| 6. | Formation of feasibility committees to process high study proposal volume and facilitate the assessment of the feasibility and scientific merit of potential studies. |