Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov 23;23(4):1309–1319. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4968-3

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics (intention-to-treat population)

Category PHP-Mel
(N = 44)
BAC
(N = 49)
Treatment group
comparison p value
Age [years; median (range)] 55.0 (33–74) 56.0 (31–77) 0.9534
Gender [n (%)] 0.4797
 Male 23 (52.3) 22 (44.9)
 Female 21 (47.7) 27 (55.1)
ECOG performance status [n (%)] 0.0284
 0 28 (63.6) 42 (85.7)
 1 13 (29.5) 6 (12.2)
Site of primary tumor [n (%)] 0.8577
 Ocular 39 (88.6) 44 (89.8)
 Cutaneous 5 (11.4) 5 (10.2)
Duration of hepatic metastasis [months; mean ± SD] 4.6 ± 7.7 4.6 ± 5.5
Hepatic tumor burden [%; median (range)] 32.5 (5–85) 25.0 (5–90) 0.5342
Site of metastases [n (%)] 0.9305
 Hepatic only 27 (61.4) 28 (57.1)
 Hepatic and extrahepatic 17 (38.6) 21 (42.9)
Previous treatment for liver metastases [n (%)]
 Chemotherapy/immunotherapy 8 (18.2) 10 (20.4) 0.9008
 Regional therapya 4 (9.1) 3 (6.1) 0.7038

PHP-Mel Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan, BAC best alternative care, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

a

Included chemoembolization, radioembolization, or ablation