Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov 23;23(4):1309–1319. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4968-3

TABLE 4.

Reasons for discontinuation of PHP-Mel treatment

Reason for discontinuation Randomized to PHP After crossover to PHP Total PHP patients
(N = 42) [n (%)] (N = 28) [n (%)] (N = 70) [n (%)]
Death 3 (4.8) 1 (3.6) 4 (4.3)
Disease progression 12 (28.6) 8 (28.6) 20 (28.6)
 Hepatic progression 3 (9.5) 1 (3.6) 4 (7.1)
 Extrahepatic progression 8 (19.0) 7 (25.0) 15 (21.4)
Adverse events 15 (35.7) 9 (32.1) 24 (34.3)
 Platelet count decreased 6 (14.3) 6 (21.4) 12 (17.1)
 Neutrophil count decreased 3 (7.1) 2 (7.1) 5 (7.1)
 Blood bilirubin increased 3 (7.1) 1 (3.6) 4 (5.7)
Patient decision 1 (2.4) 0 1 (1.4)
Investigator’s opinion 7 (16.7) 2 (7.1) 9 (12.9)
Lost to follow-up 0 0 0
Completed four cycles of therapy and no clinical indication to continue 2 (4.8) 3 (10.7) 5 (7.1)
Completed six cycles of PHP therapy or equivalent of BAC (twelve 3-week cycles) 1 (2.4) 1 (3.6) 2 (2.9)
Other 2 (4.8) 4 (14.3) 6 (8.6)

PHP Percutaneous hepatic perfusion, BAC best alternative care