Skip to main content
. 2021 May 16;13(6):e13074. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202013074

Figure 4. Ca2+ transient analysis in Fura 2‐loaded 2D hiPSC‐CM.

Figure 4

  • A–E
    Average Ca2+ transient peak (A), Ca2+ transient amplitude (B), diastolic Ca2+ (C), time to decay 80% (D), and Ca2+ decay tau (E); PLNic: n = 25 hiPSC‐CM from 2 batches and PLN p.Arg14del: n = 24 hiPSC‐CM from 2 batches, mean ± SEM, Mann–Whitney U‐test, *P < 0.05.
  • F
    Representative EHT recording.
  • G
    RR scatter (surrogate for irregular beating pattern, IBP, interdecile range of mean beat‐to‐beat distance) of PLNic and PLN p.Arg14del EHT at 1.0, 1.8, and 3.0 mM extracellular Ca2+ concentration, incubation time 9 h, recording time 50 s, PLNic: 1.0 mM: n = 24/3, 1.8 mM: n = 32/4, 3.0 mM: n = 41/5 (EHT/batches), PLN p.Arg14del: 1.0 mM: n = 15/2, 1.8 mM: n = 24/3, 3.0 mM: n = 23/3 (EHT/batches), mean ± SEM, two‐way ANOVA (comparing hiPSC lines and Ca2+ concentrations (but not time points)) with Tukey’s post hoc test, *P < 0.05. The data are representative of n = 5 independent experiments.