Skip to main content
. 2021 May;10(5):2199–2208. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.09

Table 1. Surgical comparison of trans and retro approach to PN.

Surgical steps Transperitoneal Retroperitoneal
Left Right Left Right
Port positioning Figure 1 Figures 2,3
Position of surgical robot Posterior to patient’s back Cranial to patient
Approach to kidney/renal hilum Transperitoneal approach with identification of transperitoneal landmarks/intrabdominal viscera Retroperitoneal approach with identification of psoas muscle
Mobilization of colon, splenorenal ligament, spleen and pancreatic tail Mobilization of colon, duodenum, IVC fascia Identification of artery anterior to periaortic lymph nodes. Care must be taken to avoid dissection posterior to aorta Identification of renal artery posterior to vena cava
Identification of adrenal/gonadal vein Identification of adrenal vein
Identification of renal tumor Identify tumor location based on pre-operative imaging
Peri-renal adipose tissue is removed to expose the kidney parenchyma
May utilize intraoperative imaging techniques (i.e., ultrasound)
Electrocautery is used to delineate borders for tumor excision
Arterial clamping (if necessary) Application of bulldog clamp for selective or complete renal arterial ischemia
Tumor resection vs. enucleation Tumor is removed using resection, enucleation, or combination of both
Renorrhaphy Resection bed is secured with absorbable suture. Open vascular channels at the tumor base are oversewn
Horizontal mattress renorrhaphy is completed with 2-0 barbed suture, applying surgical clips for appropriate tension on the parenchyma
If dead space is created during renorrhaphy closure, hemostatic agent bolsters may be placed prior to tightening the suture to facilitate hemostasis (23)

PN, partial nephrectomy; IVC, inferior vena cava.