Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 30;69(5):1108–1112. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2409_20

Table 6.

Significance values of difference in diagnostic parameters of GCL thickness analysis as compared to RNFL thickness analysis, SWAP and SAP

P GCL thickness analysis

Sensitivity Specificity Positive likelihood ratio Negative likelihood ratio
RNFL thickness analysis 0.454 0.267 0.151 0.516
SWAP analysis 0.001 0.031 0.02 1.00
SAP analysis <0.001 0.125 0.83 0.288