Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 13;29(6):897–910. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00754-0

Table 1.

Co-segregation analysis, in silico pathogenicity assessment and genotyping of controls in included studies.

Authors Year Segregation analysis In silico pathogenicity assessment Genotyping of controls
Conservation across species MAF and zygosity search in public databases (Gnomad, ExAC, 1000 Genomes,..) Prediction tool (s) for missense
Humbert et al. 2006 No N.A +, Unspecified tool +
Mackay et al. 2010 Yes N.A +
Abu-safieh et al. 2013 Yes + + +
Al rashed et al. 2012 Yes +, Unspecified tool
Dessalces et al. 2013 Yes N.A +
Davidson et al. 2013 Yes + + + +
Coppieters et al. 2014 Yes No +
Méjécase et al. 2017 No + + +
Gerth et al. 2017 Yes + +, Unspecified tool
Astuti et al. 2018 No + + + +
Albarry et al. 2019 Yes +, Unspecified tool
Abu-Ameerh et al. 2019 Yes + + +
Azab et al. 2019 Yes + +
Patel et al. 2016 Yes + + +
Patel et al. 2018 Yes + +
Khan et al. 2015 No N.A + +
Katsanis et. al 2001 Yes + +
Aldahmesh et al. 2009 Yes + +
Nair et al. 2017 Yes N.A + N.A
Hmani-Aifa et al. 2009 Yes + +
Ksantini et al. 2012 Yes +
Habibi et al. 2017 Yes + +
Habibi et al. 2016 Yes + + +
Audo et al. 2018 Yes + + +
Audo et al. 2017 Yes + + +
Zobor et al. 2014 Yes +
Hashmi et al. 2018 Yes N.A N.A
Jalkh et al. 2014 Yes +
Khan et al. 2019 Yes
Khan AO 2019 Yes

In many studies, the conservation across species and predictions tools were not applicable since the identified variants were either insertion/deletions, splice sites, or nonsense.

MAF minor allele frequency, + yes, − no, N.A not applicable.