Abstract
Autophagy is an important renal-protective mechanism in septic acute kidney injury (AKI). Receptor interacting protein kinase 3 (RIP3) has been implicated in the renal tubular injury and renal dysfunction during septic AKI. Here we investigated the role and mechanism of RIP3 on autophagy in septic AKI. We showed an activation of RIP3, accompanied by an accumulation of the autophagosome marker LC3II and the autophagic substrate p62, in the kidneys of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced septic AKI mice and LPS-treated cultured renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTECs). The lysosome inhibitor did not further increase the levels of LCII or p62 in LPS-treated PTECs. Moreover, inhibition of RIP3 attenuated the aberrant accumulation of LC3II and p62 under LPS treatment in vivo and in vitro. By utilizing mCherry-GFP-LC3 autophagy reporter mice in vivo and PTECs overexpression mRFP-GFP-LC3 in vitro, we observed that inhibition of RIP3 restored the formation of autolysosomes and eliminated the accumulated autophagosomes under LPS treatment. These results indicated that RIP3 impaired autophagic degradation, contributing to the accumulation of autophagosomes. Mechanistically, the nuclear translocation of transcription factor EB (TFEB), a master regulator of the lysosome and autophagy pathway, was inhibited in LPS-induced mice and LPS-treated PTECs. Inhibition of RIP3 restored the nuclear translocation of TFEB in vivo and in vitro. Co-immunoprecipitation further showed an interaction of RIP3 and TFEB in LPS-treated PTECs. Also, the expression of LAMP1 and cathepsin B, two potential target genes of TFEB involved in lysosome function, were decreased under LPS treatment in vivo and in vitro, and this decrease was rescued by inhibiting RIP3. Finally, overexpression of TFEB restored the autophagic degradation in LPS-treated PTECs. Together, the present study has identified a pivotal role of RIP3 in suppressing autophagic degradation through impeding the TFEB-lysosome pathway in septic AKI, providing potential therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of septic AKI.
Subject terms: Macroautophagy, Acute kidney injury
Introduction
Sepsis is the leading cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients, characterized by a rapid decrease of renal function accompanied by multiorgan dysfunction syndromes. Septic AKI is associated with high morbidity, accounting for nearly 50% of AKI cases in critically ill patients, and high mortality reaching up to 60–70%1–5. Pathologically, one of the major features of septic AKI is sublethal and lethal injury of renal tubular cells6. However, the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of septic AKI are poorly understood.
Receptor interacting protein kinase 3 (RIP3) is a serine/threonine kinase that plays a crucial role in mediating inflammation and cell death7. RIP3 was activated in the renal tubules of septic AKI mice and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated cultured proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTECs)8. Our recent study showed that a RIP3-selective inhibitor attenuated renal tubular apoptosis and renal dysfunction in LPS-induced septic AKI mice9. Sureshbabu et al.8, using proximal tubule-specific RIP3-knockout mice, showed an alleviation of tubular injury and restoration of renal function in septic AKI mice, further demonstrating the pathogenetic role of RIP3 in septic AKI. However, it is still unknown how RIP3 mediates nephrotoxicity and how RIP3 inhibitors protect the kidneys during septic AKI. Our previous study suggested RIP1 inhibited autophagy in LPS-induced cultured renal tubular cells10. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of RIP3 in regulating autophagy during septic AKI.
Autophagy is a highly conserved process that degrades and recycles defective proteins and organelles via lysosomes to maintain cellular homeostasis11–13. The dynamic process of autophagy is called “autophagic flux,” mainly including the formation of autophagosomes, fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes to autolysosomes, and degradation of substrates in autolysosomes12. Autophagy dysfunction is associated with the pathogenesis of a variety of diseases14–16. Using pharmacological regulators of autophagy and autophagy-deficient animal and cell models, studies have demonstrated a pivotal renal-protective role of autophagy in septic AKI10,17–21. However, the mechanism regulating autophagy during septic AKI remains unclear.
Transcription factor EB (TFEB), a “master regulator” of both the lysosome and autophagy pathway, drives the transcription of multiple lysosome- and autophagy-related genes involved in lysosome biogenesis and degradation, as well as most of the steps of autophagic flux from autophagosome formation to degradation of substrates in autolysosomes22,23. The activity of TFEB depends largely on its subcellular distribution, which is activated to translocate to the nucleus while inactivated to be retained in the cytoplasm, modified by its phosphorylation through several serine threonine kinases24. There is a significant lack of understanding of the role of TFEB in renal tubules and septic AKI.
Based on these findings and questions, the present study aimed to investigate the role and underlying mechanism of RIP3 in regulating autophagy in renal tubular cells and septic AKI.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement and patient samples
The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (GDREC2016258H; Guangdong, China). The patient study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration. Human kidney samples were obtained from one patient diagnosed with septic AKI and one patient diagnosed with minimal change disease, who underwent the renal biopsies at the Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital with the informed written consent of these patients. Human kidney samples obtained from the patient with minimal change disease were used as control, which were confirmed to be normal renal tissue by further pathological examination. Clinical characteristics of the patient with septic AKI and control subject are presented in the Supplementary Table 1.
Animals
All animal procedures undertaken according to the protocols of the Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences and were approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital. Mice were housed in a pathogen-free animal facility of Guangzhou Forevergen Biosciences (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle with free access to food and water. C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Nanjing Biomedical Research Institute of Nanjing University (Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). The Ksp1.3/Cre transgenic mice (Ksp-Cre) were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (012237; Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, ME). The renal tubular cell-specific mCherry-green fluorescent protein (GFP)-LC3 autophagy reporter mice (R26-LSL-mCherry-GFP-LC3/R26-LSL-mCherry-GFP-LC3; Ksp-Cre) were generated by Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc. (Shanghai, China). Briefly, the Cre recombinase-conditional mCherry-GFP-LC3 knock-in mouse model (R26-LSL-mCherry-GFP-LC3/+) was crossed with the Ksp-Cre mice (Supplementary Fig. 1). The mCherry-GFP-LC3 autophagy reporter mice was used to test autophagic flux as previously described25,26. The mCherry-GFP-LC3 protein initially recruited to the membranes of autophagosomes upon the induction of autophagy and was then delivered to autolysosomes. The GFP signal is sensitive to and quenched by the acidic conditions within the lysosomes, but the mCherry fluorescent signal is stable in the lysosome. Colocalization of GFP and mCherry signals (yellow fluorescence) indicates autophagosomes that have not yet fused with lysosomes. The mCherry signal alone without GFP signal (red-only fluorescence) indicates autolysosomes.
LPS-induced septic AKI mouse model
The 8- to 12-week-old male C57BL/6 mice or mCherry-GFP-LC3 reporter mice were randomly divided into three groups: (i) LPS group, mice were injected with LPS (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection; MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA); (ii) LPS + GSK’872 group, mice were injected with the RIP3-selective inhibitor GSK’872 (5 μM/kg, i.p. injection; Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) 15 min prior to LPS treatment (10 mg/kg, i.p. injection); and (iii) control group, mice were injected with sterile saline (i.p. injection). Blood samples were collected at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after LPS administration. Mice were sacrificed at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after LPS treatment for histological and biochemical analyses.
Cell culture and treatment
Mouse primary renal PTECs (C57-6015; Cell Biologics, Chicago, IL, USA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/F12 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described previously9. Cells were treated with LPS (10 μg/mL; MilliporeSigma) for 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. For RIP3 inhibition, cells were treated with GSK’872 (0.3 μM; Selleck Chemicals) 1 h prior to LPS treatment (10 μg/mL) for different time points as indicated. Control cells were treated with an equal volume dimethyl sulfoxide. To study autophagic flux, cells were treated with chloroquine (CQ; 20 μM; MilliporeSigma) for 24 h. The autophagy flux was determined by comparing the levels of LC3II and p62/SQSTM1 in the presence vs. absence of CQ.
Transfection of adenovirus and siRNAs
For RIP3, TFEB knockdown, cells were transfected with 50 nM RIP3 small interfering RNA (siRNA) or 50 nM TFEB siRNA (RiboBio, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) for 12–48 h, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Scotts Valley, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For mixed-lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) knockdown, cells were transfected with 50 nM MLKL siRNAs with three different sequences (MLKL siRNA 1–3). MLKL siRNA-3 significantly decreased the protein expression of MLKL and was used for the subsequent experiments. A scrambled siRNA (RiboBio) was used as control. The sequences of the RIP3 siRNA, TFEB siRNA, and MLKL siRNAs were listed in the Supplementary Table 2. For TFEB overexpression, cells were transfected with TFEB-overexpression plasmid (Hanbio Technology, Shanghai, China) or its vector plasmid as control for 12–48 h, using Lipofectamine 2000. To investigate the autophagic flux, cells were transfected with monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP)-GFP-LC3 adenovirus (Hanbio Technology) as we described previously27. The mRFP-GFP-LC3 protein initially recruited to the membranes of autophagosomes upon the induction of autophagy and was then delivered to autolysosomes. The GFP fluorescent signal is sensitive to and quenched by the acidic conditions within the lysosomes, but the mRFP fluorescent signal is stable in the lysosome. Colocalization of GFP and mRFP signals (yellow fluorescence) indicates autophagosomes that have not yet fused with lysosomes. The mRFP signal alone without the GFP signal (red-only fluorescence) indicates autolysosomes.
Antibodies
The following primary antibodies were used for immunoblot analysis: anti-β-actin antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number 8457; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Histone H3 (1:1000 dilution; catalog number AF0863; Affinity Biosciences, Cincinnati, OH, USA), anti-LC3A/B antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number 4108; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p62 antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number 5114; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-RIP3 antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number ab56164; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-phosphorylated RIP3 (p-RIP3) antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number ab195117; Abcam), anti-TFEB antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number A303-673A; Bethyl, Montgomery, TX, USA), anti-Cathepsin B (CTSB) antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number ab58802; Abcam), anti-LAMP1 antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number ab25630; Abcam), and anti-MLKL antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number 37705; Cell Signaling Technology). The following primary antibodies were used for Immunofluorescence staining: anti-TFEB antibody (1:100 dilution; catalog number LS-B5907; LifeSpan BioSciences, Seattle, WA, USA), anti-RIP3 antibody (1:1000 dilution; catalog number ab56164; Abcam), anti-LAMP1 (1:200 dilution; catalog number ab24170; Abcam), and anti-CTSB antibody (1:200 dilution; catalog number ab58802; Abcam).
Subcellular protein fractionation and immunoblotting
Total protein was extracted from kidney tissue or cultured proximal renal tubular cells using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysate buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) or protease inhibitor mixture (Beyotime Biotechnology), respectively. Nuclear protein was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol of CelLyticTM NuCLEARTM Extraction Kit (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA). Protein concentration was detected using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The protein of extracts was subjected to immunoblotting analysis using the method described previously9. Histone was used as the loading control of the nuclear protein28. β-actin were used as the loading control of the total protein.
Measurement of serum creatinine and BUN
Renal function was assessed by testing serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) using QuantiChromTM Creatinine Assay kit and QuantiChromTM Urea Assay kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA), respectively.
Histological analysis
Paraffin-embedded kidney tissues were cut into 4 μm sections and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with hematoxylin/eosin or periodic acid–Schiff as described previously9,27. Tubular injury score was calculated by the area of tubular epithelial cell vacuolar deformation, loss of brush border, tubular dilation, cast formation, and cell lysis. Scores 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 represented the area of injury <10%, 10–25%, 25–50%, 50–75%, and >75% of the total area, respectively. At least six different fields under the microscope (×400) were randomly selected and an average score was calculated. Histopathology was evaluated by two pathologists in a double-blinded manner.
Reverse-transcription quantitative PCR
Total RNA was extracted from the cultured cells as described previously9. Briefly, cells were treated with TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) complying with the manufacturer’s instructions and then reversed to cDNAs using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Kyoto, Japan). The cDNAs were used for quantitative PCR using a Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa). Data were analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCq method with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase as the internal control. Primer sequences are listed in the Supplementary Table 3.
Immunofluorescence staining
Coverslips covered with cells or frozen tissue sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. After washing in PBS, cells or frozen tissue sections were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5–10 min at room temperature and then blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin for 30 min. Cells or frozen tissue sections were incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. The cells or tissue sections were incubated in the dark with donkey anti-goat IgG(H + L) 488 (catalog number A-11055; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and donkey anti-rabbit IgG(H + L) 555 (catalog number A-31572; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at room temperature for 1 h and then cell nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole solution (MilliporeSigma) for 5 min. The slides were imaged by a Nikon Eclipse Ni-E confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed with Image-Pro Plus v6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA).
Co-immunoprecipitation
Co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) experiments were undertaken using a Dynabeads Protein G Immunoprecipitation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cell lysates were extracted from culture cells using Pierce IP Lysis Buffer (87787; Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with protease inhibitor (Beyotime Biotechnology). After removing nonspecific binding by Dynabeads Protein G, the cell lysates were added with an appropriate amount of anti-TFEB antibody (catalog number A303-673A; Bethyl) or anti-RIP3 antibody (catalog number ab56164; Abcam), or control IgG and then incubated at 4 °C overnight. The Dynabeads-Ab-antigen complex was washed with washing buffer and eluted with RIPA buffer for western blotting.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (MilliporeSigma). Briefly, cells were fixed with formaldehyde to fix proteins to DNA. DNA–protein fragments were pulled down with anti-TFEB antibody (ab2636; Abcam). The DNA–protein cross-link was reversed and the DNA was purified. The enrichment of particular DNA sequences was detected by downstream real-time PCR analysis. Primer sequences were listed in the Supplementary Table 4.
Electron microscopy
Renal tissues from mice were prepared as described previously9,10. Briefly, renal tissues were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 4% paraformaldehyde, and 0.02% picric acid in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) overnight at 4 °C. After washing with cacodylate buffer, renal tissues were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide and 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide for 2 h, dehydrated by a graded series of ethanol (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%) and 100% propylene oxide, and then embedded in resin (Epon 812) for 12 h. The ultrastructure was observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEM-100CX; JEOL, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The initial autophagic vacuoles, which indicated autophagosomes, were identified by a double-membrane structure, which was usually at least partly visible as two parallel membrane bilayers separated by an electron-lucent cleft and its morphologically intact contents. The late autophagic vacuoles, which indicated autolysosomes, were identified by a single-membrane structure and its electron-dense contents at various stages of degradation29.
Statistical analysis
Results are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. For animal studies, sample size was estimated according to our previous studies9, which performed similar experiments to detect significant difference between samples. Estimations of the minimal sample size for the variables measured in this study were assessed by power analysis, with an α-level of 0.05 and a power of 0.8, using StatMate 2 (http://graphpad.com/scientific-software/statmate/). Statistical analysis of the data was conducted using SPSS 21.0. Statistical differences between two groups were determined by Student’s t-test. Statistical differences among multiple groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance followed by Fisher’s least significant difference post hoc test. The variance was similar between groups that were being statistically compared. P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.
Results
RIP3 was activated to suppress autophagic degradation and lead to tubular injury and renal dysfunction in septic AKI mice
The activity of RIP3 was enhanced significantly in the kidney tissues of LPS-induced septic AKI mice, with a peak at 12 h of LPS treatment (Fig. 1A). Along with the RIP3 activation, the level of the autophagosome marker LC3II was increased at 24 and 48 h of LPS treatment (Fig. 1B), indicating an accumulation of autophagosomes, which could be caused by an increase of autophagosome formation or a blockage of autophagic degradation. In addition, p62, a substrate for autophagy, was accumulated at 24 h of LPS treatment (Fig. 1B), suggesting a suppression of autophagic degradation, which may contribute to the accumulation of autophagosomes. Moreover, inhibition of RIP3 by GSK’872, a RIP3-selective kinase inhibitor, attenuated the accumulation of both LC3II and p62 (Fig. 1C, D), indicating that the inhibition of RIP3 restored the autophagic degradation.
To explore the role of RIP3 in autophagic flux, the renal tubular cell-specific mCherry-GFP-LC3 autophagy reporter mice were used (Fig. 2A, B). Under LPS treatment, the number of autophagosomes (yellow puncta) was largely increased, whereas there was a slight increase in the number of autolysosomes (red-only puncta) compared to the control group. Inhibition of RIP3 upregulated the number of autolysosomes and downregulated the number of autophagosomes (Fig. 2B). Similarly, results from TEM showed an accumulation of initial autophagic vacuoles without obvious formation of late autophagic vehicles in the renal tubular cells of the septic AKI mice compared to the control group. Inhibition of RIP3 led to an increase of the formation of late autophagic vehicles and a decrease of the initial autophagic vacuoles (Fig. 2C). Thus, these results suggested that RIP3 inhibited the formation of autolysosomes, inhibiting the clearance of autophagosomes during septic AKI.
In accordance of the restoration of autophagic degradation, inhibition of RIP3 remarkably attenuated pathological changes of renal tubules, as well as the levels of serum creatinine and BUN as we reported previously (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c)9. Taken together, these results showed that RIP3 was activated to suppress autophagic degradation and lead to tubular injury and renal dysfunction in septic AKI.
RIP3 was activated to suppress autophagic degradation in LPS-induced cultured PTECs in vitro
Consistent with the results of our in vivo study, the activity of RIP3 was increased in a time-dependent manner in LPS-induced cultured PTECs (Fig. 3A). The level of LC3II was increased with a peak at 24 h of LPS treatment, when p62 was also markedly increased (Fig. 3B). Moreover, the lysosome inhibitor CQ30 did not increase the levels of LCII or p62 in LPS-induced cultured PTECs (Fig. 3C), further supporting that the LPS-induced accumulation of LC3II and p62 was caused by impaired autophagic degradation. The LPS-induced accumulation of LC3II and p62 was attenuated by inhibiting RIP3 pharmacologically by GSK’872 or genetically by RIP3 siRNA (Fig. 3D and Supplementary Fig. 3a). Also, in the cultured PTECs transfected with the mRFP-GFP-LC3 adenovirus, many autophagosomes (yellow puncta) appeared without obvious autolysosomes (red-only puncta) formation at 24 h of LPS treatment compared to control group. Inhibition of RIP3 induced the formation of autolysosomes and decreased accumulated autophagosomes under LPS treatment (Fig. 4A, B). These results further confirmed the insufficiency of autophagic degradation mediated by RIP3 during septic AKI.
RIP3 inhibited the nuclear translocation of TFEB and interacted with TFEB during septic AKI
The lysosome serves as the degradation hub for autophagy, which is first fused with autophagosomes and then degraded the autophagosomal cargo and the autophagosome itself. We then examined whether TFEB, a master regulator of both the lysosome and autophagy pathways, was involved in RIP3-mediated autophagic degradation suppression in septic AKI. First, the nuclear translocation of TFEB was inhibited in the renal tubular cells of septic AKI mice, which was partially restored by inhibition of RIP3 (Fig. 5A). Also, the decreased nuclear translocation of TFEB was confirmed in LPS-treated cultured PTECs, which was rescued by suppressing RIP3 through GSK’872 or RIP3 siRNA (Fig. 5B, C). Moreover, results of CoIP assay showed an interaction between RIP3 and TFEB, as well as an interaction between p-RIP3 and TFEB in LPS-induced cultured PTECs compared to the control group (Fig. 5D–F). These results suggested that RIP3 was activated to interact with TFEB and inhibit the nuclear translocation of TFEB. In addtion, the nuclear translocation of TFEB showed marginal change by inhibiting MLKL, the mediator of RIP3-induced canonical necroptotic signaling, under LPS treatment (Supplementary Fig. 4a–c), suggesting that the inhibition of TFEB was independent of MLKL in septic AKI. This was further supported by the marginal change of the accumulated LC3II level by inhibiting MLKL under LPS treatment (Supplementary Fig. 4d).
RIP3 resulted in lysosome dysfunction during septic AKI
TFEB directly promotes the transcription of several lysosome-related and autophagy-related genes22,31. We explored the effect of RIP3 on the activity of TFEB during septic AKI by testing the mRNA levels of several reported potential TFEB targets genes31. Among them, the mRNA levels of LAMP1 (marker for lysosome biogenesis32,33) and CTSB (responsible for driving proteolytic degradation within the lysosome34) were significantly downregulated in LPS-induced cultured PTECs compared to the control group, which was rescued by inhibition of RIP3 through GSK’872 or RIP3 siRNA (Fig. 6A). Moreover, the inhibition of RIP3 restored the decreased protein levels of LAMP1 and CTSB in LPS-induced PTECs (Fig. 6B, C) and in the renal tubular cells of LPS-induced mice (Fig. 6D). Taken together, these results suggested that RIP3 led to lysosome dysfunction, including impairment of lysosome biogenesis and degradation, during septic AKI.
Inhibition of TFEB-mediated autophagic degradation suppression in LPS-induced cultured PTECs
We explored the role of TFEB in LPS-induced lysosome-autophagy disorder in cultured PTECs. First, similar to LPS treatment, TFEB siRNA induced an accumulation of both LC3II and p62 (Fig. 7A and Supplementary Fig. 3b). Next, overexpression of TFEB alleviated the LPS-induced accumulation of LC3II and p62 (Fig. 7B and Supplementary Fig. 3c) and restored the autolysosome formation (Fig. 7C, D). Moreover, overexpression of TFEB restored the decreased mRNA levels of LAMP1 and CTSB (Fig. 7E). We further utilized ChIP assay to find that LPS impeded TFEB binding to the promoters of CTSB but not LAMP1 (Fig. 7F). Collectively, these results suggested that TFEB was critical for the maintenance of autophagy in renal tubular cells under physiological conditions and inhibition of TFEB mediated the autophagic degradation suppression in LPS-treated cultured PTECs.
RIP3-TFEB pathway was involved in the patient with septic AKI
We examined the expression of RIP3 and TFEB in kidney tissues from the septic AKI patient. Consistent with our in vivo and in vitro results, we observed an enhancement of RIP3 expression and an inhibition of TFEB nuclear translocation in the renal tubular cells in the septic AKI patient, accompanied by severe tubular injury (Fig. 8A–C). Notably, some parts of the cytosolic TFEB colocalized with RIP3 in the cytosol of the renal tubular cells from the septic AKI patient but not in the control subject (Fig. 8A), further supporting an interaction of RIP3 and TFEB during septic AKI.
Discussion
RIP3 has recently been identified to play a pivotal role in tubular injury and renal dysfunction in septic AKI8. Our recent study showed that RIP3 inhibitor protected against LPS-induced renal tubular cell death and kidney damage9. However, it remained elusive as to how RIP3 mediated septic AKI and how the RIP3 inhibitor protected renal tubules and the kidney. The present study has demonstrated that RIP3 was activated to suppress autophagic degradation in septic AKI mice and in LPS-treated cultured PTECs. Mechanistically, this study has, for the first time to our knowledge, demonstrated that RIP3 inhibited the nuclear translocation and activity of TFEB, further leading to lysosome dysfunction and autophagic degradation suppression. In addition, the results suggested an interaction between RIP3 and TFEB, as well as p-RIP3 and TFEB under septic conditions, which may be related to the inhibition of TFEB by RIP3. Also, our study suggested that the RIP3 inhibitor may protect the kidney by restoring the autophagic degradation during septic AKI. Thus, the present study has delineated a pivotal role of the RIP3-TFEB pathway implicated in the autophagic degradation suppression during septic AKI, providing potential therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of septic AKI.
RIP3, a major regulator of the necroptosis pathway, has been implicated in ischemia-reperfusion- and cisplatin-induced AKI35–39. Recently, the pathological role of RIP3 in contributing to renal injury during septic AKI has been reported by Sureshbabu et al.8 (genetically deleting RIP3) and our previous study (inhibiting RIP3 using a RIP3-selevtive inhibitor)9 in septic AKI mice and cultured renal tubular cells. Our present study has demonstrated the regulation of TFEB-autophagy pathway by RIP3, providing new insights into the involvement of RIP3 in AKI. Interestingly, we observed that the inhibition of TFEB-autophagy pathway was independent of MLKL in septic AKI, supporting a necroptosis-independent pathogenetic role of RIP3 in septic AKI reported by Sureshbabu et al.8.
In this study, we have identified RIP3 as a negative regulator of autophagy during septic AKI. First, RIP3 was activated in renal tubular cells of the patient with septic AKI, kidneys of LPS-induced mice, and LPS-induced cultured PTECs. The activation of RIP3 was accompanied by an accumulation of the autophagosome marker LC3II and the autophagic substrate p62 under LPS treatment in vivo and in vitro. The lysosome inhibitor did not further increase the levels of LCII or p62 in LPS-treated PTECs, suggesting that the LPS-induced accumulation of LC3II and p62 was caused by impaired autophagic degradation. Second, inhibition of RIP3 attenuated the LPS-induced accumulation of p62 in vivo and in vitro, suggesting RIP3 suppressed the clearance of autophagic substrate. Also, the LPS-induced accumulation of LC3II was attenuated by inhibition of RIP3, which may be a result of the restoration of autophagic degradation to eliminate the autophagosomes. To verify this, we explored the role of RIP3 in autophagic flux by using renal tubular cell-specific mCherry-GFP-LC3 autophagy reporter mice in vivo and PTECs overexpressing mRFP-GFP-LC3 in vitro. Inhibition of RIP3 induced autolysosome formation and decreased the accumulated autophagosomes under LPS treatment. Moreover, inhibition of RIP3 rescued the LPS-induced downregulation of LAMP1 and CTSB in vivo and in vitro, suggesting RIP3 resulted in lysosome dysfunction during septic AKI. Taken together, these results have demonstrated that RIP3 suppressed autophagic degradation during septic AKI.
The effect of RIP3 on autophagy has been reported inconsistently in other cells or tissues. RIP3 was shown to induce the conversion of LC3I to LC3II in osteosarcoma cells40 and glioblastoma cells41. In contrast with the present study, RIP3 positively regulated autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells42. In view of the discrepancy between these studies and ours, it is implicated that the effect of RIP3 on autophagy may vary from different types of cells and tissues. It is noteworthy that the autophagic flux is a dynamic process with multi-steps. There is a significant lack of understanding of which steps of the autophagic flux was targeted by RIP3. Our results suggested that RIP3 targeted the late stage of the autophagic flux at least partially by regulating autolysosome formation, lysosome biogenesis, and degradation.
The present study provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of RIP3 in autophagic degradation. The nuclear translocation of TFEB was inhibited in the renal tubular cells of the patient with septic AKI, septic AKI mice, as well as the LPS-induced cultured PTECs. Also, the activity of TFEB was decreased during septic AKI as evidenced by the downregulation of both the mRNA and protein levels of CTSB, a reported potential target gene of TFEB31. ChIP assay was further utilized to confirm the decrease of TFEB activity. Importantly, inhibition of RIP3 restored this decreased nuclear translocation and activity of TFEB in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, these results have identified RIP3 as a novel regulator of TFEB, which suppressed the nuclear translocation and activity of TFEB during septic AKI.
We next explored how RIP3 regulated TFEB. In this study, we showed that TFEB colocalized with RIP3 in the cytosol of the renal tubular cells of the patient with septic AKI. We further used CoIP assay to confirm an interaction between RIP3 and TFEB under septic conditions. Moreover, we observed an interaction between p-RIP3 and TFEB, suggesting that this interaction between RIP3 and TFEB was related to the phosphorylation of RIP3. Activated RIP3 interacted with TFEB and suppressed the nuclear translocation of TFEB. Previous study has demonstrated that the phosphorylation of RIP3 is required for its function involving in phosphorylating its target proteins43. It has also been reported that the subcellular location and activity of TFEB could be regulated through the phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of TFEB by several other serine threonine kinases including mTOR, ERK, and Calcineurin44. Further study needs to elucidate whether activated RIP3 regulate TFEB via direct phosphorylation.
Recently, TFEB-related lysosome and autophagy disorder has been implicated in several diseases including liver steatosis and neurodegenerative storage diseases45–48. In 2018, Lynch et al.49 showed that the protein levels of TFEB was decreased in cisplatin-treated cultured renal collecting duct cells and inhibition of TFEB exacerbated cell death rate in these cells. Although they did not delineate the role of TFEB in renal tubular cells and in septic AKI, their study indicated that TFEB may have a renal-protective role. The present study showed that in normal cultured PTECs, TFEB siRNA led to the accumulation of LC3II and p62. In LPS-treated cultured PTECs and the renal tubular cells of LPS-induced mice, TFEB was inhibited. Overexpression of TFEB alleviated the aberrant accumulation of LC3II and p62, and restored the autolysosome formation, CTSB, and LAMP1 in LPS-treated cultured PTECs. Thus, these results provided evidence that TFEB may be essential for maintaining the autophagy in renal tubular cells under physiological conditions and inhibition of TFEB mediated the autophagic degradation suppression during septic AKI. Notably, the binding of TFEB to the promoter of CTSB but not LAMP1 was suppressed in LPS-treated cultured PTECs measured by ChIP assay, suggesting that TFEB regulated CTSB at a transcription level, while having a transcription-independent effect on LAMP1 in renal tubular cells during septic AKI.
GSK’872, a selective inhibitor of RIP3, binds to the kinase domain of RIP3 to inhibit its kinase activity50,51. Notably, Mandal et al.51,52 found that a high dose of GSK’872 could result in a conformational change of RIP3, which promoted the cell apoptosis pathway independent of its kinase activity. Our study also has provided a reference for the safe and effective concentration of GSK’872 for the regulation of autophagy in AKI mice models.
An obvious weakness of our study is that only one septic AKI patient was examined. It is generally understood that the patients with sepsis and sepsis-induced AKI are often accompanied by multiple organ dysfunction and unstable hemodynamics, making it highly risky and often unethical to do biopsy. For this reason, very few studies collected renal biopsy from septic AKI patients and, if they did, only very few patients were examined. With the help of our intensive care unit, we worked very hard to obtain renal biopsies of one sepsis AKI patient. Also, it is important to note that our study is mainly based on cell and animal models, whereas the human biopsy examination is only to implicate the clinical relevance of our preclinical data.
In conclusion, the present study has identified a pivotal role of RIP3 in suppressing autophagic degradation during septic AKI. We have unveiled RIP3 as a novel regulator of TFEB by interacting with and inhibiting the nuclear translocation and activity of TFEB, leading to lysosome dysfunction and autophagic degradation suppression in septic AKI. The results also suggested the RIP3 inhibitor may protect the kidney by restoring the autophagic degradation in renal tubular cells during septic AKI.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank the facility of the research center in Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital for technical support.
Author contributions
R.L., S.Z., X.Z., W.D., L.Z., Y.C., Z.L., H.Y., Y.H., and Z.X. provided acquisition of the data. R.L., X.Z., D.Z., W.D., Y.C., W.W., C.L., and Z.Y. provided analysis of the data. R.L., X.Z., W.W., C.L., Z.Y., and D.Z. provided interpretation of the data. R.L. and X.Z. performed drafting of the article. S.Z., Z.D., and X.L. preformed revision of the article. X.L. performed design and supervision of the study. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570609, 81770667, and 81970575), Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (A2019028), and Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory on Immunological and Genetic Kidney Diseases (2019B121205005).
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics statement
The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (GDREC2016258H; Guangdong, China). The patient study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration. Human kidney samples from biopsies were obtained with the informed written consent of patients.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Edited by A. Linkermann
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Ruizhao Li, Xingchen Zhao, Shu Zhang
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41419-021-03865-8.
References
- 1.Uchino S, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. 2005;294:813–818. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.7.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ali T, et al. Incidence and outcomes in acute kidney injury: a comprehensive population-based study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007;18:1292–1298. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006070756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shum HP, Kong HH, Chan KC, Yan WW, Chan TM. Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients - a single-center study on its incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome predictors. Ren. Fail. 2016;38:706–716. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2016.1157749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yasuda H, Kato A, Fujigaki Y, Hishida A. Incidence and clinical outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy in Japan. Ther. Apher. Dial. 2010;14:541–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2010.00826.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bagshaw SM, et al. Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007;2:431–439. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03681106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Linkermann A, et al. Regulated cell death in AKI. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014;25:2689–2701. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014030262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shlomovitz I, Zargrian S, Gerlic M. Mechanisms of RIPK3-induced inflammation. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2017;95:166–172. doi: 10.1038/icb.2016.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sureshbabu A, et al. RIPK3 promotes sepsis-induced acute kidney injury via mitochondrial dysfunction. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e98411. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.98411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang S, et al. RIPK3 mediates renal tubular epithelial cell apoptosis in endotoxin-induced acute kidney injury. Mol. Med Rep. 2019;20:1613–1620. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dong W, et al. Necrostatin-1 attenuates sepsis-associated acute kidney injury by promoting autophagosome elimination in renal tubular epithelial cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:3194–3199. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. 2011;147:728–741. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008;451:1069–1075. doi: 10.1038/nature06639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao H, et al. The role of osteopontin in the progression of solid organ tumour. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:356. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0391-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dikic I, Elazar Z. Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:349–364. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu N, Shi Y, Zhuang S. Autophagy in chronic kidney diseases. Kidney Dis. (Basel) 2016;2:37–45. doi: 10.1159/000444841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lu Y, et al. Propofol-induced MiR-20b expression initiates endogenous cellular signal changes mitigating hypoxia/re-oxygenation-induced endothelial autophagy in vitro. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:681. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02828-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mei S, et al. Autophagy is activated to protect against endotoxic acute kidney injury. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:22171. doi: 10.1038/srep22171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hsiao HW, et al. The decline of autophagy contributes to proximal tubular dysfunction during sepsis. Shock. 2012;37:289–296. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318240b52a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Howell GM, et al. Augmenting autophagy to treat acute kidney injury during endotoxemia in mice. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leventhal JS, et al. Autophagy limits endotoxemic acute kidney injury and alters renal tubular epithelial cell cytokine expression. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0150001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Karagiannidis I, et al. Extended cytoprotective effect of autophagy in the late stages of sepsis and fluctuations in signal transduction pathways in a rat experimental model of kidney injury. Shock. 2016;45:139–147. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Settembre C, et al. TFEB links autophagy to lysosomal biogenesis. Science. 2011;332:1429–1433. doi: 10.1126/science.1204592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pastore N, Ballabio A, Brunetti-Pierri N. Autophagy master regulator TFEB induces clearance of toxic SERPINA1/α-1-antitrypsin polymers. Autophagy. 2013;9:1094–1096. doi: 10.4161/auto.24469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Puertollano R, Ferguson SM, Brugarolas J, Ballabio A. The complex relationship between TFEB transcription factor phosphorylation and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 2018;37:e98804. doi: 10.15252/embj.201798804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McWilliams TG, et al. A comparative map of macroautophagy and mitophagy in the vertebrate eye. Autophagy. 2019;15:1296–1308. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1580509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McWilliams TG, et al. Basal mitophagy occurs independently of PINK1 in mouse tissues of high metabolic demand. Cell Metab. 2018;27:439–449. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhao X, et al. Advanced glycation end-products suppress autophagic flux in podocytes by activating mammalian target of rapamycin and inhibiting nuclear translocation of transcription factor EB. J. Pathol. 2018;245:235–248. doi: 10.1002/path.5077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Silk E, Zhao H, Weng H, Ma D. The role of extracellular histone in organ injury. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2812. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Klionsky DJ, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) Autophagy. 2016;12:1–222. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Livingston MJ, et al. Persistent activation of autophagy in kidney tubular cells promotes renal interstitial fibrosis during unilateral ureteral obstruction. Autophagy. 2016;12:976–998. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1166317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sardiello M, et al. A gene network regulating lysosomal biogenesis and function. Science. 2009;325:473–477. doi: 10.1126/science.1174447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang W, et al. Up-regulation of lysosomal TRPML1 channels is essential for lysosomal adaptation to nutrient starvation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E1373–E1381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419669112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xu H, Ren D. Lysosomal physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2015;77:57–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Turk V, et al. Cysteine cathepsins: from structure, function and regulation to new frontiers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1824:68–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Linkermann A, et al. Two independent pathways of regulated necrosis mediate ischemia-reperfusion injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:12024–12029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305538110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xu Y, et al. A role for tubular necroptosis in cisplatin-induced AKI. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015;26:2647–2658. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014080741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu W, et al. RGMb protects against acute kidney injury by inhibiting tubular cell necroptosis via an MLKL-dependent mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E1475–E1484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716959115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhao H, et al. Necroptosis and parthanatos are involved in remote lung injury after receiving ischemic renal allografts in rats. Kidney Int. 2015;87:738–748. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao H, et al. Role of necroptosis in the pathogenesis of solid organ injury. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1975. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Coupienne I, Fettweis G, Piette J. RIP3 expression induces a death profile change in U2OS osteosarcoma cells after 5-ALA-PDT. Lasers Surg. Med. 2011;43:557–564. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang L, Wang H, Ding K, Xu J. FTY720 induces autophagy-related apoptosis and necroptosis in human glioblastoma cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2015;236:43–59. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Harris KG, et al. RIP3 regulates autophagy and promotes Coxsackievirus B3 infection of intestinal epithelial cells. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18:221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Frank D, Vince JE. Pyroptosis versus necroptosis: similarities, differences, and crosstalk. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:99–114. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0212-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Napolitano G, Ballabio A. TFEB at a glance. J. Cell. Sci. 2016;129:2475–2481. doi: 10.1242/jcs.146365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chao X, et al. Impaired TFEB-mediated lysosome biogenesis and autophagy promote chronic ethanol-induced liver injury and steatosis in mice. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:865–879. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang H, et al. Dynamic MTORC1-TFEB feedback signaling regulates hepatic autophagy, steatosis and liver injury in long-term nutrient oversupply. Autophagy. 2018;14:1779–1795. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1490850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Settembre C, et al. TFEB controls cellular lipid metabolism through a starvation-induced autoregulatory loop. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013;15:647–658. doi: 10.1038/ncb2718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Palmieri M, et al. mTORC1-independent TFEB activation via Akt inhibition promotes cellular clearance in neurodegenerative storage diseases. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14338. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lynch MR, et al. TFEB-driven lysosomal biogenesis is pivotal for PGC1α-dependent renal stress resistance. JCI Insight. 2019;5:e126749. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kaiser WJ, et al. Toll-like receptor 3-mediated necrosis via TRIF, RIP3, and MLKL. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:31268–31279. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.462341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mandal P, et al. RIP3 induces apoptosis independent of pronecrotic kinase activity. Mol. Cell. 2014;56:481–495. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.10.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Newton K, et al. Activity of protein kinase RIPK3 determines whether cells die by necroptosis or apoptosis. Science. 2014;343:1357–1360. doi: 10.1126/science.1249361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.