Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;13:56. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-00582-3

Table 2.

The MA performance of different kinds of MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites as MAMs

Type MAMs RLmax EAB (< − 10 dB) (GHz) Refs.
Value (dB) fm (GHz) Thickness (mm) Value (GHz) Thickness (mm)
MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites Co/C-500 − 35.3 5.8 4 5.8 (8.4–14.2) 2.5 [123]
Co/C-650 − 47.6 5.11 2 5.1 (12.1–17.2) 2 [124]
Co/C-700 − 15.7 15.1 1.7 5.4 (12.3–17.7) 1.7 [125]
Co/C-700 − 30.31 11.03 3 4.93 (8.31–13.24) 3 [126]
Co/C-800 − 39.6 9.6 2 3.8 (10.7–14.5) 2 [127]
MOF/RGO-500 − 52 9.6 4.1 7.72 (10.28–18) 3.2 [128]
CoC-rGO-2 − 44.77 12.1 2.1 5.2 (12.8–18) 1.8 [129]
Co3O4/Co/RGO − 52.8 13.12 2 10.72 (4.88–15.6) 2–4 [130]
3D Co/C-MCNT − 20.3 13.84 1.8 4.08 1.8 [131]
Co/C-MCNTs − 48.9 9 2.99 [132]
Co/CNT − 49.16 14.16 2.5 4.2 (12.4–16.6) 2.5 [133]
MWCNTs@carbonaceous CoO − 50.2 14.3 1.84 4.32 (12.32–16.64) 1.84 [134]
CNFs@carbonaceous Co/CoO − 53.1 6.56 3.54 13.52 (3.68–14.64, 15.44–18) 2–5 [135]
Co/C@PPy − 44.76 17.32 2.0 6.56 (11.04–17.60) 2.5 [136]
Co/NPC@ZnO/rGO − 45.4 14.2 2 5.4 (11.9–17.3) 2 [138]
Co/C@V2O3 − 40.1 14.1 1.5 4.64 (13.36–18) 1.5 [139]
MnO@Co/C −49.06 6.48 3.4 2.24 3.4 [140]
Co/N/C@MnO2 − 58.9 5.56 3.7 5.5 [141]
NRGO/MWCNT −69.6 12.5 1.8 4.3 (13.2 − 17.5) 1.5 [143]
Co/CNTs/CS −51.2 12 2.2 4.1 (10.3 − 14.4) 2.2 [144]
Co/C-HS − 66.5 17.6 1.53 14.3 (3.7–18.0) 1–5 [145]
Ni-MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites Ni@C-800 − 57 13.8 1.85 6 (12–18) 1–5 [146]
NPC/Ni − 39.4 4.2 [147]
Ni@C-ZIF − 86.8 7.25 2.7 7.4 (4–11.4) 1.5–4 [149]
SiC/Ni/NiO/C − 50.52 13 4 2.96 (14.76–17.72) 2.5 [150]
NiO/Ni/GN@Air@NiO/Ni/GN − 34.5 17.2 1.7 10.2 (7.8–18) 1.7–5.0 [151]
Porous flower-like Ni/C − 52.4 16.1 1.6 5 1.6 [152]
Fe-MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites Fe/C nanocubes − 22.6 4 5 7.2 (10.8–18) 2 [153]
FC-650 − 39.43 14 2 5.36 (11.76–17.12) 2 [154]
Fe/C-700-101 − 59.2 5 4.32 5 1.8 [155]
MOF (Fe)/PANI − 41.4 11.6 2 5.5 (9.8–15.3) 2 [156]
Fe3O4@NPC − 65.5 9.8 3 4.5 3 [157]
Zn-MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites ZnO/NPC/RGO − 50.5 14 2.4 7.4 (9.6–17) 2.6 [158]
Fe3O4/CNT − 43 15.2 1.5 8.3 (9.7–18) 1.75 [159]
PPy/ZIFs − 49 12.1 2.9 7.24 (10.76–18) 2.6 [160]
Ti-MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites TiO2/C − 49.6 15.8 1.6 4.6 (13.4–18 GHz) 1.6 [161]
Cu-MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites Ni/NiO/Cu@C − 38.1 14.8 3.2 [162]
Zr-MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites ZrO2/C − 57.2 15.8 3.3 11.9 (6.1–18) 3.3 [44]
ZrO2/C − 58.7 16.8 1.5 14.6 (3.4–18.0) 1–5 [163]
RE-MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites [Yb2(MH)6]n − 28.14 2 [13]
[Y2(MH)6]n·DMF 2.24 (6.8–9.04) 5
Multi-magnetic metal MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites NiCo/NPC − 51 17.9 1.5 4.5 (13.5–18) 1.5 [164]
CoNi@C − 44.8 6.8 3.2 13.3 (4.7–18.0) 1.6–4 [165]
CoNi/C − 74.7 15.6 1.8 15.1 (2.9–18.0) 0.3–5 [166]
FeCo alloy/carbon − 57.4 17.7 1.26 4.2 (11.0–15.2) [167]
Fe3Ni/C − 46.2 10.44 2.65 5.24 (12.76–18) 2 [168]
FeCoNi@C − 69.03 5.52 2.1 8.08 (9.92–18) 2.47 [169]
Core–shell FeCo@carbon/PDA − 67.8 15.8 1.75 5.3 (11.0–16.3) 2 [170]
NiCo alloy/C nanorod@CNT − 58.8 14.0 2.2 6.5 (11.5–18) 2.2 [171]
Fe–Co/NC/rGO − 43.26 11.28 2.5 9.12 (8.88–18) 2.63 [172]
FeNi@CNT/CNRs − 47.0 2.3 4.5 1.6 [173]
CoFe@C@MnO2 nanocubes − 64 15.6 1.3 9.2 (8.8–18) 1.6 [174]
Magnetic and non-magnetic metal MOF-derived PC-based nanocomposites CoO/Co/C − 66.7 7.2 3.3 5.1 (12.6–17.7) 1.8 [175]
Co@pNGC − 50.7 11.3 2.5 4.0 (12.2–16.2) 1.2 [176]
Comparison MAMs CNT − 21 5 3.5 0.5 3.5 [177]
rGO − 6.9 7 2 [178]
 graphene foam  − 34 13.1 14.3 (3.7–18) [59]
Carbon nanotube/graphene foams − 39.5  11.6  16 [179]
Carbon nanotube grown on the carbon fiber − 42 11.4 2.5 2.7 2.5 [180]
3D PPy aerogel − 22.5 12 3 5.0 (10.0–15.0) 3 [181]
PANI nanoparticle − 18.8 17.2 2 3.9 (14.1–18.0) 2 [182]
ZnO nanoparticles − 37.7 8.96 2.1 3.55 (7.5–11.05) 2.1 [183]
C3N4 nanosheets − 36.1 14.6 19.5 1.7 19.5 [184]
SiC − 24.8 11 3 4.2 (8.2–12.4) 3 [185]
Fe powder − 5.2 11 3 [186]
Fe3O4@C − 40 15.9 1.5 3.9 (14.1–18) 1.5 [93]
Flaky carbonyl iron particles − 14 0.6 1 1.6 (0.4–2) 1 [187]