Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;46(3):1355–1370. doi: 10.1002/mp.13396

Table 3.

Tests performed to characterize kV‐IGRT system and suggested tolerances

Detailed tests Test results Suggested tolerances
Mechanical accuracy
  • Laser localization

<1 mm 1 mm
  • kV imager projection offset

<0.2 mm 0.5 mm
  • kV field edge accuracy

<1.7 mm 2 mm
Geometric accuracy
  • Imaging and treatment coordinate coincidence

<1 mm 2 mm
Patient setup accuracy
  • kV 3D–3D match

<0.5 mm 1 mm
Image quality tests (regular and iCBCT reconstructions on all protocols)
  • Spatial resolution

C: ≥5 lp/cm C: not worse than 5 lp/cm
Q: per protocol (0.25–0.68 cycles/mm) Q: per protocol
  • Low‐contrast resolution

C: all HU inserts are visible C: all HU inserts are visible
Q: per protocol (2–20 for regular CBCT) Q: >2
  • CT number uniformity

C: ±30 HU ±40 HU
Q: ±30 HU
  • CT number consistency

C: ±50 HU ±50 HU
Q: ±50 HU
  • Slice thickness

C: <0.5 mm 0.5 mm
Q: <0.5 mm
  • Spatial linearity

<1 mm 1 mm
Dosimetry
  • kV CBCT dose accuracy

<20 mGy within specs Per protocol (1–40 mGy)
  • kV CBCT dose consistency

<20 mGy within baseline Per protocol (1–40 mGy)

In the table, C represents the measurements with the Catphan phantom, and Q represents the measurement with the QUART phantom.