Table 2.
Study reference | Aims/objectives | Methodology | Data collection methods | Data analysis methods | Review themes contributed to by study | Subthemes contributed to by study |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agar et al. 22 | To explore nurses’ assessment and management of delirium when caring for people with cancer, the elderly or older people requiring psychiatric care in the inpatient setting. | Grounded theory perspective | Semi-structured interviews | Thematic content analysis | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Limited understanding of delirium as a medical condition |
2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Decision-making regarding medication use | |||||
Bolton et al. 54 | To explore carer experiences of inpatient unit hospice care for people with dementia, delirium and related cognitive impairment. | Not stated | Semi-structured interviews | Thematic analysis | 2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Person-centred care, communication and challenges |
3. The roles of family in delirium care | Beyond ‘person-centred’ care: responding to the needs of the family | |||||
Family play vital roles in caregiving | ||||||
Brajtman51–53 | To explore and describe the impact of terminal restlessness and its treatment upon the family members who were witness to the event. | Phenomenological approach | Focus groups, semi-structured interviews | Content analysis | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Delirium and multidimensional suffering |
2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Person-centred care, communication and challenges | |||||
To explore an interdisciplinary team’s perceptions of families’ needs and experiences surrounding terminal restlessness. | Decision-making regarding medication use | |||||
3. The roles of family in delirium care | The distressing impact of delirium on the relationship between the patient and their family | |||||
Beyond ‘person-centred’ care: responding to the needs of the family | ||||||
Family play vital roles in caregiving | ||||||
Brajtman et al. 40 | To explore palliative care unit and home care nurses’ experiences of caring for patients with terminal delirium. | Not stated | Semi-structured interviews | Thematic content analysis | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Limited understanding of delirium as a medical condition |
Delirium and multidimensional suffering | ||||||
2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Decision-making regarding medication use | |||||
3. The roles of family in delirium care | Beyond ‘person-centred’ care: responding to the needs of the family | |||||
Bush et al. 41 | To investigate the validity and feasibility of the RASS-PAL*, a version of the RASS** slightly modified for palliative care populations, in patients experiencing agitated delirium or receiving Palliative Sedation. | Mixed methods | Semi-structured interviews | Thematic content analysis | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Limited understanding of delirium as a medical condition |
Cohen et al. 48 | To better understand the experiences of delirium of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers | Hermeneutic phenomenological approach | Phenomenological interviews | Not stated | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Delirium and multidimensional suffering |
2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Decision-making regarding medication use | |||||
3. The roles of family in delirium care | The distressing impact of delirium on the relationship between the patient and their family | |||||
Family play vital roles in caregiving | ||||||
De Vries et al. 45 | To examine the experiences of hospice nurses when administering palliative sedation in an attempt to manage the terminal restlessness experienced by cancer patients. | Phenomenological approach | Semi-structured interviews | Colazzi’s stages of analysis | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Limited understanding of delirium as a medical condition |
2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Decision-making regarding medication use | |||||
3. The roles of family in delirium care | Beyond ‘person-centred’ care: responding to the needs of the family | |||||
Gagnon et al. 42 | To develop the framework of an optimal psychoeducational intervention about delirium. | Not stated | Focus groups, semi-structured interviews | Not stated | 3. The roles of family in delirium care | Beyond ‘person-centred’ care: responding to the needs of the family |
To develop a brochure to be used as part of the psychoeducational intervention. | Family play vital roles in caregiving | |||||
To implement the psychoeducational intervention and assess its effect on family and professional caregivers. | ||||||
Greaves et al. 36 | To better understand family caregivers’ perceptions and experiences of delirium in patients with advanced cancer | Not stated | Semi-structured interviews | Content analysis | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Delirium and multidimensional suffering |
2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Decision-making regarding medication use | |||||
3. The roles of family in delirium care | The distressing impact of delirium on the relationship between the patient and their family | |||||
Family play vital roles in caregiving | ||||||
Hosie et al.23,37,38 | To explore the experiences, views and practices of inpatient palliative care nurses in delirium recognition and assessment. | Critical incident technique | Semi-structured interviews | Thematic content analysis | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Limited understanding of delirium as a medical condition |
Delirium seen as a normal part of dying | ||||||
Delirium and multidimensional suffering | ||||||
To identify nurses’ perceptions of barriers and enablers to recognition and assessment of delirium symptoms within palliative care inpatient settings | 2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Person-centred care, communication and challenges | ||||
3. The roles of family in delirium care | Family play vital roles in caregiving | |||||
Hosie et al.38,39 | To explore nurse perceptions of the feasibility of integrating the Nu-DESC*** into practice within the inpatient palliative care setting. | Not stated | Focus groups | Thematic content analysis | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Limited understanding of delirium as a medical condition |
Namba et al. 49 | To explore: (1) what the family members of terminally ill cancer patients with delirium actually experienced, (2) how they felt, (3) how they perceived delirium and (4) what support they desired from medical staff. | Not stated | Semi-structured interviews | Content analysis | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Delirium seen as a normal part of dying |
2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Person-centred care, communication and challenges | |||||
Decision-making regarding medication use | ||||||
3. The roles of family in delirium care | The distressing impact of delirium on the relationship between the patient and their family | |||||
Beyond ‘person-centred’ care: responding to the needs of the family | ||||||
Family play vital roles in caregiving | ||||||
Szarpa et al. 47 | To explore the development and progression of delirium experienced by hospice patients and to generate a theoretical model that describes the prodrome to delirium as observed by caregivers. | Grounded theory | Semi-structured interviews | Grounded theory | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Delirium and multidimensional suffering |
3. The roles of family in delirium care | Family play vital roles in caregiving | |||||
Uchida et al. 50 | To identify goals of care and treatment in terminal delirium by interviewing healthcare professionals regarding their views on currently used approaches. | Grounded theory | Semi-structured interviews | Grounded theory | 2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Person-centred care, communication and challenges |
3. The roles of family in delirium care | Beyond ‘person-centred’ care: responding to the needs of the family | |||||
Family play vital roles in caregiving | ||||||
Waterfield et al. 46 | To explore the experiences of nurses and health care assistants caring for patients with delirium in the hospice environment. | Phenomenological approach | Semi-structured interviews | Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Limited understanding of delirium as a medical condition |
2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Person-centred care, communication and challenges | |||||
Decision-making regarding medication use | ||||||
Wright et al.43,44 | To illustrate one of the ways in which hospice caregivers conceptualise end-of-life delirium and the significance of this conceptualisation for the relationships that they form with patients’ families in the hospice setting. | Ethnography | Participant observation, semi-structured interviews, document analysis | Not stated | 1. Interpretations of delirium and their influence on care | Delirium seen as a normal part of dying |
Delirium and multidimensional suffering | ||||||
2. Palliative care clinicians’ responses to the suffering of patients with delirium | Person-centred care, communication and challenges | |||||
Decision-making regarding medication use | ||||||
To examine the relational engagement between hospice nurses and their patients in a context of end-of-life delirium. | 3. The roles of family in delirium care | The distressing impact of delirium on the relationship between the patient and their family | ||||
Beyond ‘person-centred’ care: responding to the needs of the family |
Richmond agitation-sedation scale- palliative care.
Richmond agitation-sedation scale.
Nursing delirium screening scale.